|
Anne Frank!
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Kinezi |
| Whats your views on her and her writing? |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| Yo dawg, i heard you like attics, so we put an attic in yo attic so you can hide while you hide |
|
|
| Frenchie |
 |
|
|
| dimadelux |
| :stongue: :stongue: |
|
|
| chimera66 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Frenchie
|
i am such a bad person but i couldn't help laughing and had to cover it up since on a call with a co-worker |
|
|
| Rose |
| she had a thing for older men. |
|
|
| samochod |
| I feel sorry for Anne Frank. First she gets her diary published, which is every girl's worst nightmare, but on top of that she doesn't get any money from it, which is ever Jew's worst nightmare. |
|
|
| Kinezi |
Guys I want to caution you to be careful to focus primarily on the text--her diary--and its impact. Of course, you will need to talk about Anne Frank's situation and the fact that the diary is a revelation about the horrors of the Holocaust and its effects on a young girl and her family. But the main focus of your post in this thread should be on how we see The Diary of Anne Frank as an important piece of literature.
Simply to look at her work. Or examine whether the author reflected or rejected his/her times. You rely on the text, itself, to make its point. I don't want to suggest that your posts in this thread is not moving in the right direction. I simply want to caution you now.
Focus on the effects of the actual diary--helping to understand the Holocaust, changing the way we think or act. Also you may focus on the way literature (in this case a diary) can be a form of resistance to forces of power. In this way, your posts may show that Anne Frank was both reflecting (by documenting) and rejecting (by secretly resisting) her situation. This could be extremely interesting. |
|
|
| coroknight |
| Don't you mean Helen Keller? |
|
|
| Meat187 |
| I haven't read it, but I'm sure it's just some stupid drivel that only became famous because ohhhhhh, looooook it's by a cute little girl and because it's about the holocaust. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kinezi
Anne Frank was both reflecting (by documenting) and rejecting (by secretly resisting) her situation. This could be extremely interesting. |
Anne was neither reflecting nor rejecting anything... she was a frightened young girl who was (understandably) following her instinct of self-preservation and trying to cope with that distress by recording her thoughts. It's not as though her intent was to write a book for mass consumption chronicling her ordeal nor was she "resisting" in any real sense... she was hiding and scared... let's not turn her into some sort of hero, she was one of millions. |
|
|
| KiNeTiC ENeRgY |
| quote: | Originally posted by Kinezi
Guys I want to caution you to be careful to focus primarily on the text--her diary--and its impact. Of course, you will need to talk about Anne Frank's situation and the fact that the diary is a revelation about the horrors of the Holocaust and its effects on a young girl and her family. But the main focus of your post in this thread should be on how we see The Diary of Anne Frank as an important piece of literature.
Simply to look at her work. Or examine whether the author reflected or rejected his/her times. You rely on the text, itself, to make its point. I don't want to suggest that your posts in this thread is not moving in the right direction. I simply want to caution you now.
Focus on the effects of the actual diary--helping to understand the Holocaust, changing the way we think or act. Also you may focus on the way literature (in this case a diary) can be a form of resistance to forces of power. In this way, your posts may show that Anne Frank was both reflecting (by documenting) and rejecting (by secretly resisting) her situation. This could be extremely interesting. |
You do know this is the c0r right? Even Anne Frank would get ass raped in here :wtf: |
|
|
|
|
