|
92% chance of a 4.5 - 6.0 Earthquake in Los Angeles- Sunday, 3/29/09 (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| skell |
unrelated. not a 4.5 or greater as 'predicted'. ;)
edit: downgraded to a 4.3
*yawn* |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by skell
unrelated. not a 4.5 or greater as 'predicted'. ;)
edit: downgraded to a 4.3
*yawn* |
It's also not in Los Angeles :o |
|
|
| Miss Julia |
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
It's also not in Los Angeles :o |
Ummm ya, but he did predict Northern California, SF. |
|
|
| bas |
| Oh I never bothered watching the video lol |
|
|
| INXCESS |
| wow that's a pretty good prediction..:-) |
|
|
| Jim Carson |
| I was having dreams about an earthquake happening last night and this morning. Strange... :crazy: |
|
|
| skell |
| quote: | Originally posted by INXCESS
wow that's a pretty good prediction..:-) |
not really.
(quoted from the other earthquake thread)
hardly related. that moron has a horrible track record and California sits between the 2 largest seismic plates on the planet, so it's not uncommon to have a 4.x quake often somewhere in the state. it's a no-brainer and as i have pointed out in the other thread, no one in the science community takes this guy seriously. look at his methods and technology. terrible. |
|
|
| |Thrax| |
BIG  |
|
|
| groovedaddy21 |
| Some animals can predict earthquake with better accuracy than that guy. These animals usually exhibit strange and abnormal behavior days prior to the earthquake sometimes even within minutes. |
|
|
| nchs09 |
| Quake prediction hahahha |
|
|
|
|
