[New] Xone 22
|
View this Thread in Original format
BlackHole |
The new A&H mixer... for DJ like me who do not want to buy 4 channels Mixer
Any review ? |
|
|
Omega_Blue |
xone:22 for $399 vs xone:32 for $529; there's no way i'd ever buy the 22 over the 32 for that little of a price difference |
|
|
n3lly |
Sorry is this actually new? I'm nearly sure i've seen this mixer a few months ago? |
|
|
tintin11 |
quote: | Originally posted by n3lly
Sorry is this actually new? I'm nearly sure i've seen this mixer a few months ago? |
Yeah, it was posted once before on here.
Gotta say again though, it disappoints me to see A&H throwing out basic 2 channel mixers when they could be putting that R&D into something worth while. |
|
|
boris_the_bear |
that mixer looks funny |
|
|
Max Thomson |
its a scratch mixer. |
|
|
boris_the_bear |
maybe the quality is good, but the exterior looks like lower-end Numark or Gemini |
|
|
palm |
quote: | Originally posted by Max Thomson
its a scratch mixer. |
why? beacuse its two-channel? thats ignorant imo. mixer looks like all you need imo but its funny laid out. |
|
|
almar |
anyone using this ?? |
|
|
Adam420 |
quote: | Originally posted by palm
why? beacuse its two-channel? thats ignorant imo. mixer looks like all you need imo but its funny laid out. | \
There are more things that make this a scratch mixer. The crossfader is shorter than on larger mixers and the buttons/knobs are few and far between. The design in general makes it much more suitable for the motion-heavy applications that scratch DJs would be putting it through. Trust me, it's not ignorance, it's fact. Can it still be used like any other mixer? sure. |
|
|
Zild |
quote: | Originally posted by palm
why? beacuse its two-channel? thats ignorant imo. mixer looks like all you need imo but its funny laid out. |
no because it looks exactly like a scratch mixer, and it is a scratch mixer |
|
|
|
|