return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 
Was the lunar landing fake? (pg. 10)
View this Thread in Original format
Moongoose
Oh man, does that mean that we have to apologise to every nut un this thread now...oh wait we cant call them nuts any more since they were right all along

Well my world view hasnt completely shattered yet, unless the onion is interviewing Dubya next where he confesses that he did 911 or if somehow a video surfaces where obama takes off his rubber mask and reveals himself to be Hitler (or Stallin, whatever the case may be these days)
occrider
I thought this matter was settled back in 2003 ....

http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...d=&pagenumber=1
Sunsnail
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
Well, I guess the truthers were right after all!



http://www.theonion.com/content/new..._convinces_neil

pkc, I think they got us on this one. :(


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8237558.stm
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/8237558.stm


:stongue:

That's awesome!
Fir3start3r


quote:

NASA's newly launched Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has snapped images of hardware left on the moon by the Apollo astronauts, striking a blow against conspiracy theories that the landings were a hoax


http://www.newscientist.com/gallery/apollo-site-images

Sorry just need to post another pwned pic for the moon-landing-deniers cause they're so fun...

Sunsnail
Is this supposed to be a joke? Why would I accept images from NASA WHEN THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY?
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by Sunsnail
Is this supposed to be a joke? Why would I accept images from NASA WHEN THEY ARE THE ONES WHO ARE BEHIND THE CONSPIRACY?


So what now you're going to claim the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter is fake too? wow...just wow...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/18688469/...-Mission-Design

http://lunar.gsfc.nasa.gov/blog.html (all sorts of pictures here)

Not only did they launch the LRO, there was a secondary payload in the same rocket; Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS)

More about that here:
http://space.skyrocket.de/index_fra...oc_sdat/lro.htm
Krypton
Firestarter, if NASA is capable of faking the lunar landing, I'm sure they are capable of photoshopping some pics.:o
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Firestarter, if NASA is capable of faking the lunar landing, I'm sure they are capable of photoshopping some pics.:o


Yes. Because everything NASA does is fake. :rolleyes:
Krypton
quote:
Originally posted by Fir3start3r
Yes. Because everything NASA does is fake. :rolleyes:


I'd say half of the they'v done was fake. do you actually think we'v sent rovers to Mars, I mean come on, open your mind!

thedoggyworld
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...ZHW-ywD9AL00A00
Fir3start3r
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
I'd say half of the they'v done was fake. do you actually think we'v sent rovers to Mars, I mean come on, open your mind!


I my god...you're right! What the hell was I thinking!!? You know, I actually just thought about it for a brief sec. and WHAM! It's all so clear now...
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [10] 11 
Privacy Statement