|
How can i find out that my speakers sound properly? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Fledz |
The bigger your room is generally the less room treatment you need. If you look at the big studios, the rooms are so large and the monitors positioned well enough (ie away from walls) that they rarely need any bass traps.
Alan obviously does as his room is small so he wants to minimise the "bouncing off the walls" and also because his monitors are close to the corners which can wreak havoc with the low end.
Microlab - The trick is to learn what your monitors sound like by listening to other tracks, that way you will know what to compensate for. Also it's very important to check your tracks on other sources which you're very familiar with like your iPod, car stereo, regular hi-fi speakers etc. |
|
|
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stylz
Naaaaah....not the pro's I see, it's obvious there is no room treatment. |
Show us examples. I find this hard to believe. |
|
|
| Stylz |
| I'm sure you've seen the D.Ramirez vid in the master list. What about the funkagenda in the studio with? |
|
|
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stylz
I'm sure you've seen the D.Ramirez vid in the master list. |
Watch the video again and you will see his walls are cambered in behind his monitors. That is a form of treatment in itself.
Can't see enough in the other video to tell.
Regardless... When you buy a pair of studio monitors, one of the key things you look for is a flat frequency response. This usually equates to something like 50hz-20khz +/-3db. Poor acoustics can turn that frequency response to +/-10db or more. Thus, anyone who puts expensive monitors in an untreated room is a retard. Obviously, anyone who argues acoustics are not important has no idea what they are talking about.
That said, some people get lucky and don't need treatment. In your typical home of 2.5x3m rooms, this is obviously unlikely.
More to the point, just because a "pro" does something does not mean it is right. |
|
|
| Stylz |
| lol now I'm arguing against treatment am I? Ahhh the good ole "put words in his mouth" trick. Gotta love it. Your argument seems to be "the pro's do it" so your just as guilty in that department too my friend. All I'm saying is it might not be so essential or important to go buy "$1000" worth of treatment. Is it ideal to go buy treatment? Hell yeah! Am I going to do that before I buy a decent pair of monitors? Hell no. I've actually seen it suggested that treatment is more important than good monitors. |
|
|
| dj_alfi |
| Get a wav of one of those sweeping sines and listen if the volume suddenly goes up or down. |
|
|
| echosystm |
| quote: | Originally posted by Stylz
Your argument seems to be "the pro's do it" so your just as guilty in that department too my friend. |
:conf:
i said i think it's unlikely that most pro's lack treatment. that's not the same as saying you have to have treatment because pro's do. anyhow...
| quote: | Originally posted by Stylz
Am I going to do that before I buy a decent pair of monitors? Hell no. I've actually seen it suggested that treatment is more important than good monitors. |
they go hand in hand. If you're buying krk rockits or yamaha hs, then acoustics probably are going to be a major cbf. however, if you are buying dynaudio, focals and so on, you would be stupid to not put some money into acoustics (if your acoustics are not good, which they probably aren't). speakers only sound as good as the room they are in, that is the point. $1,500 dynaudios will sound like $400 krks in a poor room. in such circumstances you would be better off buying $1,250 monitors and putting $250 into your acoustics - then you have $1,250 speakers that sound like $1,250 speakers. make sense? |
|
|
| palm |
| Get PA speakers lol, they get the sound out there anyway. just keep a bit distance lol so u get the real stage feeling of things, this is how it will be playd back anyway. |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by echosystm
Watch the video again and you will see his walls are cambered in behind his monitors. That is a form of treatment in itself.
Can't see enough in the other video to tell.
Regardless... When you buy a pair of studio monitors, one of the key things you look for is a flat frequency response. This usually equates to something like 50hz-20khz +/-3db. Poor acoustics can turn that frequency response to +/-10db or more. Thus, anyone who puts expensive monitors in an untreated room is a retard. Obviously, anyone who argues acoustics are not important has no idea what they are talking about.
That said, some people get lucky and don't need treatment. In your typical home of 2.5x3m rooms, this is obviously unlikely.
More to the point, just because a "pro" does something does not mean it is right. |
i guess ima retard and i i'm too lazy to buy foam, but i dont understand how putting acoustic foam can increase the sound quality of the sound. |
|
|
| palm |
| quote: | Originally posted by orTofønChiLd
i guess ima retard and i i'm too lazy to buy foam, but i dont understand how putting acoustic foam can increase the sound quality of the sound. |
then u might as well quit now |
|
|
| orTofønChiLd |
| quote: | Originally posted by palm
then u might as well quit now |
i don't need to quit i'm always spending my money on other things like buying tracks. I mean how is quality greatly improved by adding just foam. Does it make it sound more analogue? lol |
|
|
| palm |
| man are u acting stupid? try shout at a concrete wall and listen. then try shout at foam. whats the difference? if u cant hear it then u should stick with buying tracks. |
|
|
|
|
