|
Appendix considered more valuable (than) then we thought (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Fledz |
| Ah I see but regardless it's a secondary response, even that wiki article shows it. In humans it's mainly for warmth (or at least it was). |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
Ah I see but regardless it's a secondary response, even that wiki article shows it. In humans it's mainly for warmth (or at least it was). |
sure.. not very effective unless you're a hairy mofo lol.
for instance it serves no purpose to certain racial groups or peoples which tend to have little to no hair. |
|
|
| Fledz |
| I'm moderately hairy :gsmile: :toothless |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fledz
I'm moderately hairy :gsmile: :toothless |
there are alot of people that are not :) |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| I guess up until 1200 or so, men and women had almost exactly the same body hair patterns. :wtf: |
|
|
| XoxidE |
| Next thing youll here is that your tonsils have the cure for the aids. |
|
|
| infinity HiGH |
| quote: | Originally posted by Energy_3
 |
Kitty!! |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by XoxidE
Next thing youll here is that your tonsils have the cure for the aids. |
you're doubting the usefulness of the appendix? |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
that wiki article was interesting. I gathered from it that its not particularly geared towards one idea but as it said moreso that goose bumps were a response towards emotion.
how do we argue though that from around year 1200 we had similar hair patterns given the demographic nature of the species? im not denying this just trying to understand it, and if so, that this was the case, then along with the hair patterns, goose bumps became a genetically inherent composite globally, not individually specialized to one particular sub group. And, what is the relationship between hair and goose bumps? |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Energy_3
that wiki article was interesting. I gathered from it that its not particularly geared towards one idea but as it said moreso that goose bumps were a response towards emotion.
how do we argue though that from around year 1200 we had similar hair patterns given the demographic nature of the species? im not denying this just trying to understand it, and if so, that this was the case, then along with the hair patterns, goose bumps became a genetically inherent composite globally, not individually specialized to one particular sub group. And, what is the relationship between hair and goose bumps? |
I think he was making a joke |
|
|
| Energy_3 |
i see, well even that being said, its prob the case". the variations would have been slight..!
Damm im a sucker :eek: |
|
|
| Spam |
Hey, now that TC has fixed the title to include the word "WE", do you think they could correct that spelling on "then"... should be "than".
Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
