|
quaid...start the reactor. (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Akridrot |
| quote: | Originally posted by Acton
Why remove it? Let the foetus develop and give the kid a caesarian.
A mum at the age of one, cashback. |
I wish humans could have kids really early though. Like micro-babies. If you have a kid before puberty, it's a micro-baby... not premature (because it will be healthy), but smaller than usual in order for it to come out.
Maybe we could have these micro-babies come out of the baby and then put it back in the original mother so that she can gestate her granddaughter/clonedaughter for her own daughter.
This would allow us to grow scores of children for personal/family use at a much faster rate. It would be convenient for those of us who needed a lot of babies in a short period of time, without all the overhead (black market, human trafficking, surrogate wombs for rent).
EDIT:
of course this doesn't take boys into account (and why would I? I don't need boys), perhaps we should have something to impregnate babies so that they can create the micro babies. Like... impregnate the baby girl, have her make a little embryo... then remove it in a few weeks or something, and repeat. So you can exhaust her eggs before she even hits puberty and you have a whole collection of granddaughters.
after you extract the micro-babies, you have to suspend their growth so that it's not wasted. i'm sure you can preserve them for a long time with current technology (and future technology will only improve).
only problem is... who's going to deliver those babies? with all the extra people overseas, I'm sure you could pay a few hundred lower class women to have those babies for a small fortune. Then you just ship or fly them back here and enjoy. |
|
|
| boris_the_bear |
^:wtf:
| quote: | Originally posted by Meat187
It really shows today's decline of moral values when girls get pregnant at an age like that. |
:stongue: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Is that a massive hole in the crotch of her pants? :wtf: |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Is that a massive hole in the crotch of her pants? :wtf: |
you pedo |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Good idea: somebody chop pedobear coming out of the hole in her pants. |
|
|
| bas |
| quote: | Originally posted by Akridrot
only problem is... who's going to deliver those babies? with all the extra people overseas, I'm sure you could pay a few hundred lower class women to have those babies for a small fortune. Then you just ship or fly them back here and enjoy. |
You thought all that out and didn't get to the natural conclusion of Nano-bots? You in moron :rolleyes: |
|
|
| aquila |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
Good idea: somebody chop pedobear coming out of the hole in her pants. |
? |
|
|
| Acton |
| quote: | Originally posted by aquila
? |
:stongue: |
|
|
| trancechan |
| quote: | Originally posted by bamski
ooooppenn yooour miiiind :stongue: |
the truth is there to finddd |
|
|
| boris_the_bear |
| quote: | Originally posted by aquila
? |
this is wrong in all 15 dimensions of the string theory:nervous: |
|
|
| Fledz |
| There's only 11 you nutcase. |
|
|
| aquila |
| Yes I know. A two-dimensional anthropomorphic perverted bear cannot exist in the third dimension with an impregnated baby whilst the photo has inadvertently captured but an element of four dimensions. |
|
|
|
|
