|
mauro picotto - cali
|
View this Thread in Original format
| iMaGe |
| i'm renaming all my mp3s. i found the original version to be named "back to cali". the push remix is named "return to cali". which is the right one? |
|
|
| starglider |
| The album version and initial release is titled Back To Cali and the later vinyls with remixes went under the title of Return To Cali. So I suppose the technical title is Return, although it's a bit of a grey area. |
|
|
| Hell_Copter |
it was originally called Back To Cali
but the new remixes got the name Retuen...
the original is Back |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| both are decent tunes. |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
| I just named it “Back To Cali,” to match suit with the original. What also annoys me is when tracks get re-released with new mixes and they change the title to: Producer – Track 2002 (Remix). Why they bother with this I don’t know, it’s the same track just with extra remixes! :rolleyes: If people are that desperate to know when it was re-released they can easily read the info on the sleeve or label. |
|
|
| iMaGe |
thanks for the help all.
Spin Doctor: as to why ppl do this, i really dont know. but i sure as hell hated it when they changed voyage to viagra. |
|
|
| starglider |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spin Doctor
I just named it “Back To Cali,” to match suit with the original. What also annoys me is when tracks get re-released with new mixes and they change the title to: Producer – Track 2002 (Remix). Why they bother with this I don’t know, it’s the same track just with extra remixes!
|
Yeah! I hate this too. I'm fairly anal when it comes to naming my mp3s, and I usually just ignore the year unless it's a whole new mix by the original producer (eg, VDM - Flowtation 2001). And I'll always rename the mixes so that they all have the same song name... it just bugs me otherwise. :p |
|
|
| Spin Doctor |
| quote: | Originally posted by starglider
Yeah! I hate this too. I'm fairly anal when it comes to naming my mp3s, and I usually just ignore the year unless it's a whole new mix by the original producer (eg, VDM - Flowtation 2001). And I'll always rename the mixes so that they all have the same song name... it just bugs me otherwise. :p |
Phew! I was starting to think I was the only one who was retentive when it came to naming MP3’s! :) |
|
|
| CortexBomb |
| quote: | Originally posted by starglider
The album version and initial release is titled Back To Cali and the later vinyls with remixes went under the title of Return To Cali. So I suppose the technical title is Return, although it's a bit of a grey area. |
I wish producers would stop with the renaming thing...I was really annoyed with Tiesto when he decided to do the whole (Sub)Urban Train thing as well...what's wrong with simply designating it as a vocal or non-vocal in the mix information? It'd definitely make it easier on the rest of us! |
|
|
| iMaGe |
| its the quest to become commercial. rename a song that would have more appeal to the general public. |
|
|
| Raccoon |
| True true. I also hate when they give the Original Mix weird names so you cant tell which ones the Original Mix. Why cant they just have it Original Mix, [Name] Remix, [Name] Remix, as simple as that! |
|
|
| trancaholic |
| hell_copter & starglider: do you actually posses the new vinyl with a "return to..." title on it, or do you just speak from what you've read on mp3 infoz (which could be mislabeled)? |
|
|
|
|
