return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

 
Super rich are $300 billion lighter
View this Thread in Original format
Barack5
quote:
The financial crisis cut the net worth of the nation's 400 most wealthy individuals to $1.27 trillion this year, according to published list.


I would not even call the Obama administration progressive or interested in money distribution. Some call it that.

This is a good deal for us middle class folks. Obama says he would prefer to spread the wealth around.

It's interesting the way they would go about it.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/09/30/new...019[URL]http://
Clovis
Oh the humanity
ziptnf
Should be more.
Comrade Stalin
The value of their holdings may be down but the top 1% still own the bottom 95%.
Capitalizt
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
The value of their holdings may be down but the top 1% still own the bottom 95%.


Except the wealth pie isn't static, so stats like this are utterly meaningless.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalizt
Except the wealth pie isn't static, so stats like this are utterly meaningless.


Wealth gap

Darkarbiter
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
Wealth gap


What about the wealth gap under stalinism and the rampant corruption :P

Also doesn't that figure also sortof depend on how many ceo's there are. Just because there are less companies around so they ceo's get payed a bit more doesn't make workers worse off. Number of CEO's in that graph and test conditions (is there a minimum size of a company for a ceo to be concidere a ceo?) are required to be able to judge this effectively.
Comrade Stalin
quote:
Originally posted by Darkarbiter
What about the wealth gap under stalinism and the rampant corruption :P


I created a classless society you capitalist pig! My NKVD will re-educate you.

quote:
Also doesn't that figure also sortof depend on how many ceo's there are. Just because there are less companies around so they ceo's get payed a bit more doesn't make workers worse off. Number of CEO's in that graph and test conditions (is there a minimum size of a company for a ceo to be concidere a ceo?) are required to be able to judge this effectively.


So are you implying there is no increasing wealth gap? I didn't conduct the study, so I am not the one to ask about how the study was done. Nonetheless, I think the study was well done, conducted with academic diligence.
Darkarbiter
quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
I created a classless society you capitalist pig! My NKVD will re-educate you.

Well your NKVD already killed the guy in my avatar (I bet you don't event know who he is :stongue:

and it's abundantly clear from my arguments that I'm neither capitalist nor a pig. Unless ofcourse you're one of those anarchists who think's the POUM were "fascists in disuguise"


quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Stalin
So are you implying there is no increasing wealth gap? I didn't conduct the study, so I am not the one to ask about how the study was done. Nonetheless, I think the study was well done, conducted with academic diligence.

Well I'm not sure, I'm just unsure of the interpretation of statistics so something like that I'm wary of.
Lira
How on Earth...? Oh, well, if you're not a bot, please reply to this message and say something about Uzbekistan that makes sense. If you ignore this message and continue posting, I'm going to conclude you're indeed a bot.

Barack7
youre a ing laijsoir ealnsfd fso in bgj;alk
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
 
Privacy Statement