return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 
FAO Australia (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
LoveHate
she wanted me to go down on her, i told the bitch i dont eat swine.
R!CH
quote:
Originally posted by adi_hanson
When is this global warming gonna kick in?
In northern england at 5 this mornin it wasnt present.
Or was Global warmings cousin Global in freezing babysitting?.


As you can tell by the sarcasm , I think Global warming was an idea that has turned into an economy and is a load of pretentious bull.


oh ya, there was also a cold snap in the bay area last week that totally disproves global warming. also since the sandwich shop i went to yesterday was busy its fair to say that the recession is over and the economy is at full steam. and since there were no shootings in oakland in the paper this morning that proves that crime is no longer an issue. i love extrapolating one data point in my personal experience to massive generalizations.
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by adi_hanson
I was specifically told by the media 3 years ago that we would have baking long summers and mild winters coupled with a 13 foot sea level rise , which dont matter to me as im living 800 ft above sea level.
It was promised , and it aint here yet:wtf:


Ah yes, those rascally media scientists.
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Here's the thing I wonder. How do people who deny climate change reconcile that with guys like this (https://breeze.ucdavis.edu/p43042572/), who are spending entire careers on teasing out really non-dramatic aspects of climate change? This guy is not measuring carbon concentrations in oyster shells for the glory. There are thousands of these people, dorkily and steadily piecing out the causes and predicting effects.

If it is all a conspiracy and nothing is happening, how do denialists conceive of these guys? Do they think these monotonous nerds who talk in jargon (don't take that the wrong way. I'm sexually attracted to every one of them.) are making it up to promote the conspiracy? Like, they spend the morning thinking up esoteric ways of measuring wave energy by sand lost at different gauges across the state and the afternoon faking their data so they can please Al Gore? They've done this now for 10 years and they plan to make an entire career out of making up the detailed groundwork for fake climate change? All of them? On nothing? Imagine the secret conferences they must hold to synchronize their stories and settle on an allowable variance between the made-up river data, the made-up precipitation data and the made-up ocean data. Besides the groupies, WHAT FOR?


http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ez...oyster_guy.html
Domesticated
I wouldn't say I'm a denialist, but I'm not fully convinced either. History has shown that the Earth was capable of reasonably rapid temperature shifts before man ever jumped out of the trees. Though it's sensible to assume that we might be causing the current shift, I don't think the evidence is as conclusive as the media makes out.
Acton
quote:
Originally posted by adi_hanson


Adi, due to global warming, the UK is going to get colder, mainly due to the 'forecasted' decrease in temperature of the gulf stream (apparently due to melting Arctic ice). So, the increase in 'gwobal woppa' isn't going to have the effect most Brits think!

For those that haven't heard the official new term for global warming, please see below....












quote:
Originally posted by Domesticated
I wouldn't say I'm a denialist, but I'm not fully convinced either. History has shown that the Earth was capable of reasonably rapid temperature shifts before man ever jumped out of the trees. Though it's sensible to assume that we might be causing the current shift, I don't think the evidence is as conclusive as the media makes out.



Evidence has shown that the Earth is currently going through a natural 'heating stage', but the evidence also suggests that human activity is severely accelerating it. I'll look for the source soon, when I find it, I'll stick it up.
The17sss
/\

What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!? :stongue:
narcism
quote:
Originally posted by Ania_xox
Ironically enough, yesterday, Melbourne was statistically the hottest spot on earth at 40 degrees Celsius.

:toocool:


:stongue: It wasn't 40 in melbourne yesterday
Lebezniatnikov
quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
/\

What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!? :stongue:


You're an AGW skeptic? Really?
R!CH
quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
/\

What for??? Like everything else, follow the money. I'm sure the millions and millions of grant dollars the "scientists" have been obtaining for their research efforts has nothing to do with it. I'd be happy to measure the carbon concentration of oysters, prying them open with my teeth, for that kind of loot. We've already seen the evidence recently leaked showing the higher ups discussing how to manipulate the raw data to obtain the desired results... and how they've thrown away all the official raw data because they were "moving to a new building and needed the extra space." As Tony Blair said today, "The world must take action on climate change even if the science is not correct." WHAT!? :stongue:


that is the most retarded excuse for a motive i've ever heard. one that i imagine can only come from a person whose never been to graduate school. people strain the limits of their mental capacity for a phd in science for a decade or more not just so they can go out and get grant money thrown at them for fake science. people who get advanced degrees in science have a passion for seeking the truth through evidence-based experimentation grounded in logic. you understand that no matter how many millions of dollars are thrown at their institution for research, they can only use it to conduct research right? their salaries remain the same regardless. and what the hell would be the use in playing with a million dollars to prove that gravity is fake or some other ridiculous theory? i imagine that would get old and unfulfilling after a day. but of course, this grant money is the key behind the climate change science conspiracy and everyone in academia is in on it.

The17sss
quote:
Originally posted by Lebezniatnikov
You're an AGW skeptic? Really?


You buy into utopian liberal farces, and believe massive expansions of government is for the best? Really?

quote:
Originally posted by R!CH
that is the most retarded excuse for a motive i've ever heard. one that i imagine can only come from a person whose never studied science in college. people strain the limits of their mental capacity for a phd in science for a decade or more not just so they can go out and get grant money thrown at them for fake science. people who get advanced degrees in science have a passion for seeking the truth through evidence-based experimentation grounded in logic. you understand that no matter how many millions of dollars are thrown at their institution for research, they can only use it to conduct research right? their salaries remain the same regardless. but of course, this grant money is the key behind the climate change science conspiracy and everyone in academia is in on it.


Human nature doesn't change; money and notiariety motivates and corrupts. You need to get out of the classroom and enter the real world, peon. BTW... I have 2 masters degrees, one in engineering. That includes plenty of "research methods" study using the scientific method. Last time I checked, the scientific method doesn't work by declaring a result first, then tweaking data in whichever way possible to line up with that pre-determined result.
R!CH
quote:
Originally posted by The17sss
Last time I checked, the scientific method doesn't work by declaring a result first, then tweaking data in whichever way possible to line up with that pre-determined result.


last time i checked that's not what happened. i figured you for a cynic, hope that works out for you.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 
Privacy Statement