|
Spread some Christmas cheer (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| couch-potato |
| quote: | Originally posted by jennypie
This is all beginning to sound like an Ayn Rand novel. |
 |
|
|
| wienerschnitzel |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Is it official!?!? |
no, lol. there was an IF! thursday is the day of truth. |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
You have to consider their socialization, the fact that they don't live in possession obsessed societies, the fact that they don't have a million pressures on them day to day to work faster, harder, more efficiently in a world that seems to just zip by.
Westerners are some of the unhappiest people in the world because they have pretty much become machines. Little time to be with family, little time to sleep or wind down, compounding pressures to perform and have "stuff" that people judge and base your worth upon. A cultural obsession with appearance and social status etc. etc.
So while I will agree that there are a lot of unhappy people with everything they could possibly need who should appreciate what they do have, the context that the statement was made in was stupid. When we're talking about people who don't have the things they need, telling them to suck it up and appreciate what they have is ridiculous. Sure, they may be or seem happier, but it doesn't mean their stomachs aren't growling from hunger. |
I know that most westerners are just cattle too foolish to question the logic of the culture they were born into. I don't begrudge them for it any more than I begrudge an ant for being an ant or a rock for being a rock. But that doesn't mean I would really doing them a favor by indulging their material obsessions; helping someone run on the hedonic treadmill is no help at all.
On the other hand it's certainly a different case when someone lacks a basic need. I have my doubts, however, that many of the recipients of such acts of "Christmas cheer" are indeed so situated. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
if you give your bf an brand new iphone, he'll love you for it for up to 90 days every time he looks at it, but after that time it just becomes his phone. the longest lasting gifts are the experiential ones. a $400 weekend getaway will last longer and mean more based upon the memories created than a $400 gadget. just some unrelated food for thought. |
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. Happiness levels tend to normalise after 90 days, not gratitude. Gift giving has been an important aspect of social bonding since immemorial times, as any book published on this topic after Marcel Mauss' "The Gift" points out. |
|
|
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Anyway, I am not disagreeing with the overall idea... I just think you are applying it to the wrong situations. People who have what they need should appreciate what they have. People who are going hungry and suffering with various problems shouldn't simply be expected to do the same, and then be used as an excuse not to help them out when you can. |
well i'm not suggesting your gesture to feed the hungry and homeless is pointless or unhelpful. if that's what you're doing, that's pretty cool and i hope the people who receive it can appreciate that. but giving gifts to poor people who are asking for it over the internet, that's a real headscratcher to me. subsistently poor people who have a computer and internet probably have a bunch of other things they don't need like a tv with a cable package and a fridge full of alcohol. those people are probably fishing for hand outs, expecting them, and not really concerned with who it comes from or when. i doubt they are in as desperate a situation as they sell themselves to be. i could be wrong. then again, i could copy that ad and see what comes my way. |
|
|
| R!CH |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
I'm sorry, but that's nonsense. Happiness levels tend to normalise after 90 days, not gratitude. Gift giving has been an important aspect of social bonding since immemorial times, as any book published on this topic after Marcel Mauss' "The Gift" points out. |
i'm sorry but is that last statement somehow supposed to validate the first? |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
i'm sorry but is that last statement somehow supposed to validate the first? |
No, they work together, but they're independent from one another: I first just pointed out that what you said is a misreading of the current psychology research on happiness; and the second is about a long-standing tradition in social studies about the importance of gift giving. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by R!CH
right but any time i start to feel unhappy or unfortunate about anything, say a speeding ticket or getting my wallet stolen, all i have to think back to is all the things that haven't happened to me. i have all my fingers and toes, arms and legs, sanity, freedom, health, memories, consciousness, life, etc... while there are others who are paraplegic, schizophrenic, imprisoned, terminally ill, demented, retarded, comatose, deformed and dead. it really puts my troubles into perspective every time. i'm sure this mindset could help most poor people out there. feeling sorry for yourself doesn't ever help your situation. |
Your problem is you don't understand people and their problems. But that's ok. :)
Also ROFL @ Rand comic. Lmfao. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| quote: | Originally posted by Theresa
Say that to a single mom who can barely afford to give her kids food every day or the homeless man sleeping under the bridge in -46 degree weather or the people who are starving to death in 3rd world countries.
It's hard to be happy when you can't even get your basic needs. Only someone who has never experienced being without would say something as silly as that. |
do you ever notice that most homeless people are fat? or that the people that tend to use the foodbank are fat?
isnt that ironic? you would think underprivilidged people would be frail and hungry.
Welcome to north america.. |
|
|
| Al |
to some extent I do agree with some point R!ch is making here. Happiness is what matters in the end. Theressa's gesture is very thoughtful, even if it brings warmth into the souls of those in need, even if it's a temporary relief, a relief is better than no relief at all.
True happiness vs. materialism
People find happiness in different aspects in life. Some are happy to spend time with the loved ones and be healthy, it fulfills the soul. Let's be honest, IF you're not healthy, you sure as hell aren't happy.
Most less $$$$ fortunate folks take happiness in the matter of family unity, laughter, a good time enough to be a memory worth remembering and laugh back.
Those living under corrupt regimes and continuously suffer do need to know that someone can help them, makes them feel better and gives them a lapse of looking at the hard times they're living; if you get, you must give.
Which leads to materialism and selfishness which we're plenty of. The exchange of consumables(gifts with temporary to no value) has taken over the whole holiday spirit to a whole new level of ridiculous behaviors; Everybody must give and receive items of monetary value because frankly, the higher the price tag the higher the level of satisfaction of the receiver; especially in the big cities, since talk of them came up.
Most folks only seem to care of people in their social circle and nothing more; everything else ghosts out.
The mindset topic.
Yeah, that's the key to most problems; but the solution is not to start thinking of all the negatives and instead to think positive, and scouter to the next feasible solutions.
People worthy of making change need a little push to get themselves going again. People worthy of changing refusing to change deserve no sympathy and deserve the sorry ass life they've made for themselves, yeah I'm talking about some lazy ass begger bums. |
|
|
| Lira |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nrg2Nfinit
do you ever notice that most homeless people are fat? or that the people that tend to use the foodbank are fat?
isnt that ironic? you would think underprivilidged people would be frail and hungry. |
Actually, Karim, junk food is cheaper. Therefore, the less money you have, the more you need to rely on it... and, consequently, the fatter you get. |
|
|
| Theresa |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
Actually, Karim, junk food is cheaper. Therefore, the less money you have, the more you need to rely on it... and, consequently, the fatter you get. |
And the more unhealthy you get, making you more likely to take sick days, become stressed and have stress related illnesses and overall have a lower quality of living. |
|
|
|
|
