|
Which of these logos do you prefer? (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Seandroid |
| quote: | Originally posted by bas
...ok. |
Is this what you're seeing? How the can you not tell the difference? |
|
|
| LAdazeNYnights |
| ok the new one is a slightly refined version of the old one. awesome. |
|
|
| Seandroid |
| quote: | Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights
ok the new one is a slightly refined version of the old one. awesome. |
Exactly. I didn't say it was otherwise? I asked people which they liked better, the old glowier design or the new sharper design. |
|
|
| FuzzQi |
 |
|
|
| Seandroid |
| quote: | Originally posted by FuzzQi
|
I love your use of Papyrus. Such an ugly font. |
|
|
| Sushipunk |
| quote: | Originally posted by FuzzQi
|
:stongue: Well played. |
|
|
| dj_alfi |
| the new one looks better, but that top-thingie looked better when it had the same width all over, like in the old one. |
|
|
| nefardec |
sharp lines are better.
I think the crescent weakens the whole thing a lot.
Maybe you should try making the arc wider and placing it across the logotype, within each individual letter, so that it's implied rather than presented as an afterthought. This would make the logotype have a unique look which makes it more than just an out of the box tech font.
My general rule of thumb in design is, if you feel that you have to use a swoosh, your logo is probably .
http://lekowicz.com/library/logohell/logohell.html
http://www.thestreet.com/story/986150/swoosh-there-it-is-in-fact-swooshlike-logos-are-everywhere.html |
|
|
| EXPRECDJ |
NEW LOOKS COOL
| quote: | Originally posted by Seandroid
I decided I wanted to refine my logo design a bit, and I needed to make it vector anyway so it was scaleable, so I figured I might as well update it.
I think the new one looks sharper. BTW I know they're cheesy but it's intentional cheese because it's über recognizable.
New
Old
 |
|
|
|
| Seandroid |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
sharp lines are better.
I think the crescent weakens the whole thing a lot.
Maybe you should try making the arc wider and placing it across the logotype, within each individual letter, so that it's implied rather than presented as an afterthought. This would make the logotype have a unique look which makes it more than just an out of the box tech font.
My general rule of thumb in design is, if you feel that you have to use a swoosh, your logo is probably .
http://lekowicz.com/library/logohell/logohell.html
http://www.thestreet.com/story/9861...everywhere.html |
Lmao, it's not really a swoosh. I know how frowned upon they are :p Look at what it's pointing to. it starts at the A and moves on. It says both "Sean" and "Android."
Think about how the amazon logo has that arrow that goes from A to Z.
| quote: | Originally posted by dj_alfi
the new one looks better, but that top-thingie looked better when it had the same width all over, like in the old one. |
The old one thinned out at the edge too exactly the same way. Look a little closer. |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Seandroid
Exactly. I didn't say it was otherwise? I asked people which they liked better, the old glowier design or the new sharper design. |
No, you said it was quite a bit different and all but called bas blind for not being able to tell the difference. I couldn't tell much of a difference at first before I looked at it a few times either. |
|
|
|
|
