|
Do you smoke? (pg. 4)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Vivid Boy |
| lol it was hilarious. thats what she gets for carrying water bottle and polluting our earth |
|
|
| Chris Crossland |
| quote: | Originally posted by meriter
that guy's hair is an even greater mystery than machu picchu |
:D |
|
|
| Ted Promo |
| What is wrong about her hurting? Hm? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
Its validity as a socially respectable art-form -OR- that it's not a symptom of your scathing insecurity relating to a laundry list of possible inadequacies.
Take your pick, er, well... both, really. |
what if i just find prick acts to randoms amusing? why is the target of the prick act specifically relevant? it would've been just as good (possibly better) had they picked on grandma or someone in a wheelchair. |
|
|
| justin |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
Is the OP a or something? |
KPS |
|
|
| wizniz |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vivid Boy
lol it was hilarious. thats what she gets for carrying water bottle and polluting our earth |
pollution. lolz ironic. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
what if i just find prick acts to randoms amusing? why is the target of the prick act specifically relevant? it would've been just as good (possibly better) had they picked on grandma or someone in a wheelchair. |
You're proposing that, by reducing or removing the sexual component of the equation and replacing it with any unknown variable less than anyone-capable-of-fighting-back, your enjoyment doesn't equate to the reflection of a psychological need satisfied by your proposed model of simple (not sexual) sadism.
False. |
|
|
| knowhope |
| If it was a fat kid, PKC would still laugh out of his "prickness". |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
You're proposing that, by reducing or removing the sexual component of the equation and replacing it with any unknown variable less than anyone-capable-of-fighting-back, your enjoyment doesn't equate to the reflection of a psychological need satisfied by your proposed model of simple (not sexual) sadism.
False. |
that's exactly what im saying (though im not sure you've written it correctly- should that be "your enjoyment is equated"??). the specific nature of the target of the act played no part in my enjoyment, though as i already mentioned, even more helpless targets may have increased that enjoyment. also had they managed to throw some racism in, that too may have increased my enjoyment.
i honestly didn't notice a sexual component in the equation (other than the chick appeared attractive). it certainly did not increase or decrease the humour i found in the act, because her attractiveness (or not) was not relevant to me. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| It's not truly sadism if there isn't a sexual component. |
|
|
| Fledz |
| I read the thread first, then watched the video. Seriously, that's it? , talk about "white people problems" :rolleyes: |
|
|
|
|
