return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > DJing / Production / Promotion > Production Studio

Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Rich wub-wub sound (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
Ponemax
quote:
Originally posted by Beatflux
You'll need to load up 100 instances of 3xOSC, and set each one to a sine wave. From there you'll need to program each partial's envelope and pitch to get that rich wub-wub sound you've always wanted.

I'd recommend an i7 processor, but if you don't have one you'll need to eventually freeze each channel to keep from FL from crashing. Good luck.



Haha. Thanks, I think!

Can you at least elaborate on how to adjust the pitch and envelope? Maybe I will open up 10 instances.
Beatflux
quote:
Originally posted by Ponemax
Haha. Thanks, I think!

Can you at least elaborate on how to adjust the pitch and envelope? Maybe I will open up 10 instances.


This is Massive:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajRw1f7QwOU
-FSP-
quote:
Originally posted by Ponemax
Haha. Thanks, I think!

Can you at least elaborate on how to adjust the pitch and envelope? Maybe I will open up 10 instances.


He's joking. Or at least I hope he's joking. I don't know how 3xosc works but you probably need only 2 at most for that sound, and judging by the name of "3xosc" it must already have 3 oscilators so it might even do the job so 2 instance is already an overkill.

But perhaps the filter for 3xosc just doesn't do the job for you which is something I doubt, but that's why i'm suggesting other synths.
fuxzz
If I were you I would look up synth1, its free and sounds pretty good. At least it is much nicer to work with than 3xosc IMO.

http://www.kvraudio.com/get/214.html
Ponemax
Do you guys really think I need those if I already have Sytrus or Toxic Biohazard?
Beatflux
Massive is really THE synth for Dubstep.
Nick Cenik
quote:
Originally posted by G-Con
We should all know that most sounds can be made on ANY synth. The trick is learning how to do it. Not just finding out what synths have the correct presets...


Exactly.
EddieZilker
Why? Just to make sure dubstep stays ossified as a caricature of popular music in spite of the more creative sounds which came out of it? I'm sorry but while music in general doesn't suffer from it, there actually is a limited economy to what brostep can achieve.
Ponemax
OH NOES! EDDIE DOESN'T LIKE DUBSTEP SO I GUESS I SHOULD RE-EVAULUATE MY MUSICAL TASTES!

Thanks for helping me to see the light.

By the way... aren't you the same guy that was hating in my posts about 6 months ago and had to have the thread deleted cause you got owned?

Why do you persist?
orTofønChiLd
uh oh we have an alt ladies and gentlemen

EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by Ponemax
OH NOES! EDDIE DOESN'T LIKE DUBSTEP SO I GUESS I SHOULD RE-EVAULUATE MY MUSICAL TASTES!

Thanks for helping me to see the light.

By the way... aren't you the same guy that was hating in my posts about 6 months ago and had to have the thread deleted cause you got owned?

Why do you persist?


I'm questioning the artistic integrity of making dubstep and not really being a dick about it. You're somewhat posturing and defensive, however. You are also mistaken concerning the individual you happened to "own" as I'm not that familiar with you but if you really want to test how hard you can be owned, start a thread in the COR. I'm more than willing to take a monumental down your neck, but I'll be ed if I do that, here.


http://www.tranceaddict.com/forums/...p?s=&forumid=16
Ponemax
Uh you came to my thread where I've asked for technical help with completely useless criticsm, and a mocking tone (brostep).

I'd call that being a dick.

Also, you could never own me.

Can you please just not comment in my threads, as I've already asked you to do? I suppose that's too much to ask.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Privacy Statement