|
FAO: Ron Paul Supporters (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Sorry, I don't believe I saw a single name in your response. Which candidate, other then Ron Paul, shares ways in which wasteful government spending would be reduced or completely eliminated again? |
Sorry, I don't believe I saw all your chromosomes... Were you born retarded? :conf: |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
And I'm sorry, but I don't believe you've made a single rational argument and have yet to abandon your consistent use of logical fallacy.
It appears we are at an impasse. |
C'mon man. Just one name!
I'll even help start this (even though it was already a point made in the very first post). Ron Paul would eliminate wasteful government spending by getting rid of the Department of Education.
Ok, now your turn. Name another candidate that has a plan or way of removing government waste and tell us their idea. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
C'mon man. Just one name! |
Not the point. The point is that logical argument is anathema to you. |
|
|
| BTG |
YEAH! TEAR IT ALL DOWN! |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
Not the point. The point is that logical argument is anathema to you. |
What did you mean when you responded with "only?" when I said that Ron Paul is the only person who seems in favor of getting rid of wasteful spending? Maybe we are misunderstanding each other.
I just want to point out that you haven't made any argument either. You just keep trying to point out that I'm not making an argument, which I never claimed to do in the first place. I was just making an observation. There is a difference. :) |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
...government spending by getting rid of the Department of Education. |
Your ignorance is more expensive than education ever will be. |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
What did you mean when you responded with "only?" when I said that Ron Paul is the only person who seems in favor of getting rid of wasteful spending? Maybe we are misunderstanding each other. |
I mean the argument, itself, is hyperbolic.
Should I start quoting Christopher Lasch on education or do you think you can follow? |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
I mean the argument, itself, is hyperbolic.
Should I start quoting Christopher Lasch on education or do you think you can follow? |
Really, I wasn't exaggerating. But since you seem to think I am, I'm interested in who else you think falls into the same category that I put Paul in. You still haven't given us a name. :( |
|
|
| srussell0018 |
| YEAH EDDIE, WHERE'S THE NAME? |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| Just one other candidate. :) |
|
|
| EddieZilker |
| quote: | Originally posted by DOOMBOT
Really, I wasn't exaggerating. But since you seem to think I am, I'm interested in who else you think falls into the same category that I put Paul in. You still haven't given us a name. :( |
I'm going to be very frank with you. Here's one point that you absolutely shouldn't miss. If Ron Paul ever won, dismantling every thing he says he'll dismantle, this country will descend into third-world status faster than you can read an Ayn Rand novel. Finding a candidate who says he'll do more? Probably impossible. Comes close?
Romney and Cain. Why? Romney, widely promoted as a business owner, made his wealth in acquiring companies, dismantling them, and then selling them. Every company he purchased has gone out of business after he sold them. Cain's Flat Tax deal is almost as much of a ing joke as what poor, deluded Paul has planned. Additionally, every single one of them has promised, in some form or another, dismantling next to everything, in some form or another.
Here's the point, in case you missed it: No matter who you elect president from the whole panel of Right Wing contenders, this country is abso-ing-lutely ed as ed can ing a mothering -nut ******. |
|
|
| DOOMBOT |
| quote: | Originally posted by EddieZilker
I'm going to be very frank with you. Here's one point that you absolutely shouldn't miss. If Ron Paul ever won, dismantling every thing he says he'll dismantle, this country will descend into third-world status faster than you can read an Ayn Rand novel. Finding a candidate who says he'll do more? Probably impossible. Comes close? |
I disagree but won't go into that here.
Wow! Two candidates! See? That wasn't hard. :)
| quote: | | Why? Romney, widely promoted as a business owner, made his wealth in acquiring companies, dismantling them, and then selling them. Every company he purchased has gone out of business after he sold them. Cain's Flat Tax deal is almost as much of a ing joke as what poor, deluded Paul has planned. Additionally, every single one of them has promised, in some form or another, dismantling next to everything, in some form or another. |
Again, I disagree with you on some things here but I'm not getting into it in this thread.
Thanks for finally addressing the question. It took you a little while but that is ok. I think you may have thought I was trapping you into something. |
|
|
|
|
