|
Girls taking pictures together (and some times guys if they are f@ggots)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Adam420 |
| What's with girls putting their faces right up next to one another when they take pictures? I notice this all the time and it ing annoys me. Like 3 girls will basically have their faces/heads touching one another's and often times making some pretty stupid looking faces. I don't get it. Why isn't taking a picture together enough? Why do your faces have to be touching one another? |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by Adam420
What's with girls putting their faces right up next to one another when they take pictures? I notice this all the time and it ing annoys me. Like 3 girls will basically have their faces/heads touching one another's and often times making some pretty stupid looking faces. I don't get it. Why isn't taking a picture together enough? Why do your faces have to be touching one another? |
i think it's more that men experience a broader sense of homophobia. |
|
|
| D-res |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
i think it's more that men experience a broader sense of homophobia. |
You would go there |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by Adam420
What's with girls putting their faces right up next to one another when they take pictures? I notice this all the time and it ing annoys me. Like 3 girls will basically have their faces/heads touching one another's and often times making some pretty stupid looking faces. I don't get it. Why isn't taking a picture together enough? Why do your faces have to be touching one another? |
There is actually a pretty simple reason if you think about it.
Often the pictures are taken with a cellphone or a compact camera, and held at arms length. The lens on those cameras is not that wide usually so the field of view is fairly limited. To get everyone in the picture while the camera is only held at most two and a half to three feet away the subjects have to scrunch in together. If they let someone else take the photo there wouldn't be a need to scrunch in like that.
The stupid faces are another thing... |
|
|
| kadomony |
 |
|
|
| nefardec |
| quote: | Originally posted by D-res
You would go there |
seriously. if most of you saw a photo of a bunch of guys smiling with their faces pressed up against one another you'd say 'looks like a gay' |
|
|
| Banora |
| quote: | Originally posted by Adam420
What's with girls putting their faces right up next to one another when they take pictures? I notice this all the time and it ing annoys me. Like 3 girls will basically have their faces/heads touching one another's and often times making some pretty stupid looking faces. I don't get it. Why isn't taking a picture together enough? Why do your faces have to be touching one another? |
Because they are ing retarded? |
|
|
| Adam420 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
There is actually a pretty simple reason if you think about it.
Often the pictures are taken with a cellphone or a compact camera, and held at arms length. The lens on those cameras is not that wide usually so the field of view is fairly limited. To get everyone in the picture while the camera is only held at most two and a half to three feet away the subjects have to scrunch in together. If they let someone else take the photo there wouldn't be a need to scrunch in like that.
The stupid faces are another thing... |
Makes sense but that's not always the case. |
|
|
| LAdazeNYnights |
| i am 12 and wut is foggot? |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights
i am 12 and wut is foggot? |
Its what the guy was that raped you. |
|
|
| Halcyon+On+On |
| quote: | Originally posted by nefardec
seriously. if most of you saw a photo of a bunch of guys smiling with their faces pressed up against one another you'd say 'looks like a gay' |
You perpetually demonstrate an utter misunderstanding of heterosexual politics. Frankly, I am offended at your insensitivity and judgment. |
|
|
|
|
