|
Trance Music Forums - Promotional Mix (Classics)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Blake Baltimore |
This is a promotional mix I made for Trance Music Forums. Please come and join new community that is putting the music forum back on the map! These tracks range from the year 2000 to 2009 and 130-140 bpm!! Enjoy!! =]
01. Oceanlab - Satellite (Alucard's Saving Spaceghost Mix)[Ultra] 2008
02. Dogzilla - Without You (Farce Remix)[Maelstrom Records] 2006
03. Prince Quick Mix feat. Chronic - Over The Edge (Original Mix)[Armada] 2007
04. The Space Brothers - Shine (Blake Jarrell & Jeff Devas Space Roomates Mix)[Captivating Sounds(Armada)] 2007
05. Abdul Bayyari feat. Josh Money - 400 Years Till Dawn (Original Mix)[Enhanced Progressive] 2007
06. Cosmic Gate feat. Jan Johnston - I feel Wonderful (Comsic Gate's Am To PM Mix)[Black Hole Recordings] 2005
07. Peter McCowan - N.E.T. Not Enough Time (Oiginal Mix)[Somatic Sense Future Sounds] 2005
08. Utah Saints - Lost Vagueness (Oliver Lieb's Main Mix)[Echo] 2000
09. Wamdue Project - King Of My Castle (Sander Van Doorn Remix)[Central Station Records] 2007
10. Tiesto feat. Kirsty Hawkshaw - Just Be (Original Mix)[Kontor Records] 2004
11. Ferry Corsten - Beautiful (Extended Mix) [Flashover Recordings] 2007
12. Mallorca Lee - You Are Here (Mecha L-Yen Remix)[MLXL] 2009
13. Majai - Phoria (DJ Eco Rebel Audio Remix)[Tetsuo] 2008
14. Ervesto vs. Bastian - Dark side Of The Moon (Dogzilla Pure Filth Remix)[High Contrast Recordings(Be Yourself Music)] 2005
15. Paul Webster - Istanbul ( Original Mix) [Captivating Sounds(Armada)] 2009
16. Chop Shop - Chop Shop (Original Mix) [Planet Traxx Records] 2009
Stream from Mixcloud
Download from Mixcrate
TMF Promo Mix |
|
|
| KilldaDJ |
| only one track from 2000...cant really say its classic? |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| quote: | Originally posted by KilldaDJ
only one track from 2000...cant really say its classic? |
Would not call the track from 2000 classic or the whole mix? |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| quote: | Originally posted by Euforix
Can't really believe someone calls a track from Armada and released in 2009 a classic. I have to admit I don't see any classics in that TL (except maybe #8 but it hasn't really gained a classic status imo) |
Thanks for your insulting thought bro. I consider anything a couple years old or older to be classic, much like many other DJs that drop "classics" in their sets, typically at the end. Those tracks are mostly 2 years old and older. What makes a track classic to you? Just curious. |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| Thanks for getting back to me about it. I agree that the "real" classics were the originals but, with things constantly changing in the industry I feel it's acceptable to refer to something as classic when only 2 years old. Take Markus Schulz for example. He does a Classic Showcase every year and many of his tracks are not any older than those in my list. He has been around and established long enough. |
|
|
| rdevito |
| quote: | Originally posted by Blake Baltimore
Take Markus Schulz for example. |
Don't take Markus Schulz...seriously. |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| quote: | Originally posted by rdevito
Don't take Markus Schulz...seriously. |
Your opinion... |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Blake Baltimore
Your opinion... |
It's a pretty good opinion. |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
It's a pretty good opinion. |
And who do you like then? |
|
|
| RJT |
| quote: | Originally posted by Blake Baltimore
And who do you like then? |
Trance/prog are not so much my bag, but I used to really enjoy Markus Schulz, actually. Armin & Oakenfold too. That doesn't necessarily mean I think they've got a particularly broad appreciation for what constitutes "classic" trance.
I just think you're going to run into a lot of resistance calling something like this a "classics" mix, and defaulting to Markus for credibility, particularly on a trance forum.
It's a wide world out there. Dive on in. |
|
|
| DJSoulstone |
I have to take partly Blakes position here.
As far as I experienced it, a "classic" track is usually regarded to as a high quality track, that got a lot of attention in some period of time and is still occasionally played today. Meaning, it didn't disappear immediately, like so many others. You can actually define a "classic" for any given period of time, like a classic of 90's Trance or classic of post 2000 or classic of 2009, etc.
Where rdevito and RJT are definately right is, that this isn't "old-school". This term is only used for pre super-saw Trance. But Blake didn't call it old-school, so there's no real problem, but a little confusion.
So my advice is to add a period of time if you call a mix "classic". For example in this case: "Classics from 2005 to 2009". Having two tracks from before that doesn't matter. :) (although you did that in the original post as well... :toothless ) |
|
|
| Blake Baltimore |
| quote: | Originally posted by RJT
Trance/prog are not so much my bag, but I used to really enjoy Markus Schulz, actually. Armin & Oakenfold too. That doesn't necessarily mean I think they've got a particularly broad appreciation for what constitutes "classic" trance.
I just think you're going to run into a lot of resistance calling something like this a "classics" mix, and defaulting to Markus for credibility, particularly on a trance forum.
It's a wide world out there. Dive on in. |
I do still like Markus. Not as much as I used to though. I don't listen to Armin or Oakenfold anymore either but, I used to as well.
I'm very aware that the world of EDM is vast. I have been dedicated to it for 12 years. It's all I listen to. That may not be as much as some but, still more than others. Anyway, I felt I was going with the "norm". There are other DJs that do "classics" other than Markus such as, M.I.K.E, Matt Darey and Myon & Shane 54 just to name a few. And again, most are typically no more than 10 years old. I do understand that if you want to get technical about then maybe they all are not true classics but, that is a matter of opinion. Bottom line. Thanks for the replies RJT.
| quote: | Originally posted by DJSoulstone
I have to take partly Blakes position here.
As far as I experienced it, a "classic" track is usually regarded to as a high quality track, that got a lot of attention in some period of time and is still occasionally played today. Meaning, it didn't disappear immediately, like so many others. You can actually define a "classic" for any given period of time, like a classic of 90's Trance or classic of post 2000 or classic of 2009, etc.
Where rdevito and RJT are definately right is, that this isn't "old-school". This term is only used for pre super-saw Trance. But Blake didn't call it old-school, so there's no real problem, but a little confusion.
So my advice is to add a period of time if you call a mix "classic". For example in this case: "Classics from 2005 to 2009". Having two tracks from before that doesn't matter. :) (although you did that in the original post as well... :toothless ) |
Well put bro. Very good post and great middle ground. I think you nailed it. Thanks for your reply. |
|
|
|
|
