|
Cure for Cancer found in Canada... Pharmacy's don't care if it doesn't make them $$$
|
View this Thread in Original format
| chris_leslie7 |
LINK
Discuss...
I think it's quite sad, sounds like the pharmacy's just wanna keep us sick and keep making money off of us, or the health care system. |
|
|
| chinamon |
| I wouldn't say that pharmacies don't care.... It's health Canada that probably doesn't care. I'm sure hat pharmacies would probably love to have a cure for cancer on their shelves. |
|
|
| Dior Homme |
We will never have an accessible cure for cancer. It will always be kept from us in order to profit. Sad reality.
I think we would have had one by now. |
|
|
| geroin |
| quote: | Originally posted by chinamon
I wouldn't say that pharmacies don't care.... It's health Canada that probably doesn't care. I'm sure hat pharmacies would probably love to have a cure for cancer on their shelves. |
did u watch the video? |
|
|
| chinamon |
| quote: | Originally posted by geroin
did u watch the video? |
Yes and it states that it is the pharmaceutical companies (ie. Bayer, Pfizer, etc) that are not interested because there is no profit in it for them. I showed my dad the video (he owns a pharmacy) and he thinks the federal government should get involved with funding if the pharmaceutical companies are too self-centered to do so. |
|
|
| jester |
| Never trust pharmaceutical companies. They want you constantly sick. Plus if you take one pill, you need to take other pills to combat the side-effects. |
|
|
| GGM |
| I don't really buy it. If this was a viable cure for cancer there would be countries, companies, universities, people etc that would gladly pay the money to have the name attached to it. Billions of dollars are spent each year on cancer research and they're saying this drug just needs a 100 million investment? |
|
|
| KStuff |
Respectful Insolence and Science Based Medicine are my go to sites for looking up quackery.
As a rule of thumb, when someone claims to "cure" cancer and spends more time bashing "Big Pharma" instead of talking about real data, it's a good sign that it's quackery.
As for pharmaceutical companies, they are businesses, not charities; their role is to find drugs that are profitable, which is difficult considering the $millions needed for trials. That is why public research exists.
EDIT: As for people suppressing the cure, that doesn't make any sense. Cancer is really common, almost everyone will have family or friends or themselves that are affected by it. Do you think that ALL these people are in on a conspiracy that would rather count their money and watch their loved ones die??
Did "Big Pharma" try to suppress polio vaccines, because selling iron lungs is profitable? No, because it doesn't make any sense, and it doesn't in this case either. |
|
|
| cammaxwell |
| quote: | Originally posted by GGM
Billions of dollars are spent each year on cancer research and they're saying this drug just needs a 100 million investment? |
Exactly....billions are spent each year and it's a large industry, a cure would kill that. I'm not saying this was or can be a cure, but I do believe that some would prefer we never find a cure so the machine keeps turning... |
|
|
| chris_leslie7 |
| quote: | Originally posted by jester
Never trust pharmaceutical companies. They want you constantly sick. Plus if you take one pill, you need to take other pills to combat the side-effects. |
+1, always said this |
|
|
|
|
