Originally posted by saluyamo
Who is/was Zidumare?
+1
quote:
Originally posted by ziptnf
This guy is like a low budget William Ashley.
Who is/was William Ashley?
ok let me get this straight:
Zidumare = William Ashley Alt?
EddieZilker
No.
William Ashley is the messiah of all trolls. He is literally Jesus to your try-hard Jim Bakker ambitions. He was so good at trolling because he wasn't actually trolling, at all. Much like you, he had his own daft opinions on the ways of the world. He didn't just believe everything he read. He believed everything he wrote.
But he had a persistent finesse for speaking on matters he had no authority to be speaking on. To say he had no authority actually fails to address my meaning. At the risk of having you launch into a lecture on the perils of capitalism, there is a term of economics called dissaving. When someone is in a condition of dissaving, they are actually spending more money than what is actually required to keep them afloat.
Much like a welfare queen over-draws her bank account and resorts to pay-day loans to rebalance it - there-by obtaining the condition of dissaving - William Ashley obtained the condition disauthority, disexpertise, or disgenius. So much so that not even the word, retarded, suffices to describe him. Retarded does not describe the opposite condition of genius. Retarded and genius exist as descriptors consistent with a continuum of positive integers used to measure intellect (yes, I know - how can a society as corrupt as ours measure something it can't comprehend or some other nonsense). But, until now, there is no term to describe what may mathematically be regarded as (genius)(-1). If a genius has an IQ greater than 180, William Ashley's IQ was -180.
Zidumare could rightfully be described as mildly retarded. He knows how to work a computer and locate the lower-case E logo in order to launch Microsoft's Internet Explorer. He has a passion for music and was capable of contriving staunchly static, profoundly grooveless loops, the melodies of which were constituted by predominantly enharmonic intervals. In an ideal world, where no child is left behind, Zidumare would still be left behind. He was so predictable that the Turing test was administered, not to detect artificial intelligence but rather, artificial stupidity. Abandoned at birth to a wild pack of self-help audio cassette tapes, Zidumare believed he could do anything. Subsequently, when confronted by incontrovertible evidence that his reasoning was as sound as contemporary Haitian architecture, Zidumare came to believe that he was the synthesis of both the devil and Jesus.
Which brings us to you; being neither Zidumare nor William Ashley. You could best be described as Zidumare 2.0; maybe 2.5 after a firmware update. Regardless, you're still stupid with a belief in yourself that defies your ability to comprehend how fallacious that belief actually is. You also believe yourself to be God. But you seem to have been programmed with an infallibility subroutine that immediately recognizes and contravenes otherwise astutely logical, well-reasoned arguments; turning them on their head with completely erroneous conflation consistent with your rather diminutive and inadequate world-view.
While slightly less retarded (although I hesitate to use the word, smarter), you're still incapable of (and possibly even immune to) grasping the cold, hard fact that the foundation of your ideas is in a constant state of liquefaction. The sandy particulate mass constituting the basis for all of your reasoning shifts rapidly and unpredictably, allowing you to pivot your arguments and reframe them as something that appears to be more thought-out than the argument preceding it. It's still completely incapable of actually sorting out the real facts of a particular topic. Eventually, because of the shifting quick-sand your argument is founded on, you grow weary and start asking people to prove their points in ways you have ascertained they are completely incapable of; predominantly because you're incapable of achieving the same "feats" of intellectual dominion.
So, you're definitely no William Ashley but at least you're not Zidumare.
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
No.
William Ashley is the messiah of all trolls. He is literally Jesus to your try-hard Jim Bakker ambitions. He was so good at trolling because he wasn't actually trolling, at all. Much like you, he had his own daft opinions on the ways of the world. He didn't just believe everything he read. He believed everything he wrote.
But he had a persistent finesse for speaking on matters he had no authority to be speaking on. To say he had no authority actually fails to address my meaning. At the risk of having you launch into a lecture on the perils of capitalism, there is a term of economics called dissaving. When someone is in a condition of dissaving, they are actually spending more money than what is actually required to keep them afloat.
Much like a welfare queen over-draws her bank account and resorts to pay-day loans to rebalance it - there-by obtaining the condition of dissaving - William Ashley obtained the condition disauthority, disexpertise, or disgenius. So much so that not even the word, retarded, suffices to describe him. Retarded does not describe the opposite condition of genius. Retarded and genius exist as descriptors consistent with a continuum of positive integers used to measure intellect (yes, I know - how can a society as corrupt as ours measure something it can't comprehend or some other nonsense). But, until now, there is no term to describe what may mathematically be regarded as (genius)(-1). If a genius has an IQ greater than 180, William Ashley's IQ was -180.
Zidumare could rightfully be described as mildly retarded. He knows how to work a computer and locate the lower-case E logo in order to launch Microsoft's Internet Explorer. He has a passion for music and was capable of contriving staunchly static, profoundly grooveless loops, the melodies of which were constituted by predominantly enharmonic intervals. In an ideal world, where no child is left behind, Zidumare would still be left behind. He was so predictable that the Turing test was administered, not to detect artificial intelligence but rather, artificial stupidity. Abandoned at birth to a wild pack of self-help audio cassette tapes, Zidumare believed he could do anything. Subsequently, when confronted by incontrovertible evidence that his reasoning was as sound as contemporary Haitian architecture, Zidumare came to believe that he was the synthesis of both the devil and Jesus.
Which brings us to you; being neither Zidumare nor William Ashley. You could best be described as Zidumare 2.0; maybe 2.5 after a firmware update. Regardless, you're still stupid with a belief in yourself that defies your ability to comprehend how fallacious that belief actually is. You also believe yourself to be God. But you seem to have been programmed with an infallibility subroutine that immediately recognizes and contravenes otherwise astutely logical, well-reasoned arguments; turning them on their head with completely erroneous conflation consistent with your rather diminutive and inadequate world-view.
While slightly less retarded (although I hesitate to use the word, smarter), you're still incapable of (and possibly even immune to) grasping the cold, hard fact that the foundation of your ideas is in a constant state of liquefaction. The sandy particulate mass constituting the basis for all of your reasoning shifts rapidly and unpredictably, allowing you to pivot your arguments and reframe them as something that appears to be more thought-out than the argument preceding it. It's still completely incapable of actually sorting out the real facts of a particular topic. Eventually, because of the shifting quick-sand your argument is founded on, you grow weary and start asking people to prove their points in ways you have ascertained they are completely incapable of; predominantly because you're incapable of achieving the same "feats" of intellectual dominion.
So, you're definitely no William Ashley but at least you're not Zidumare.
1. i dont believe in anything.
2. the only thing that i consider a troll, is when intelligence trolls stupidity.
3. language is a constant learning process. please devote the time necessary for you to reduce the slavery of illiteracy. you will always be illiterate, but at least you wont be ignorant.
Originally posted by TheTrinity
1. i dont believe in anything.
False: by virtue of the fact that by typing the phrase in question, you clearly believed that communicates something.
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
2. the only thing that i consider a troll, is when intelligence trolls stupidity.
Yet you lack the ability to distinguish between either concept that you've previously stated, you don't believe in.
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
3. language is a constant learning process.
It seems like it's a process you find tedious.
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity please devote the time necessary for you to reduce the slavery of illiteracy. you will always be illiterate, but at least you wont be ignorant.
This makes no sense, at all, and the link is effectively dead.
Nrg2Nfinit
IMO
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
False: by virtue of the fact that by typing the phrase in question, you clearly believed that communicates something.
i am trying to make you aware of truth. belief is what concerns you, (who does not know truth) and not me (who is concerned only with truth) and not belief.
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
It seems like it's a process you find tedious.
I am letting you know that language has infinite depth.
quote:
Originally posted by EddieZilker
This makes no sense, at all, and the link is effectively dead.
illiteracy has to do with the fact, that no human knows the full depth of the objective truth that hides between words in language. ignorance has to do with the ignorance of one's own illiteracy.
regarding the link:
1. right next to the display time of this post, there is a box called "profile". click it.
2. At the top, it states:
Profile For TheTrinity // Search for all posts by this user.
The link you were looking for is this one. It's okay; these things are difficult to master, for some.
I usually charge for lessons, but I just couldn't bring myself to stand by and watch the spread of your inane ramblings impeded by a little inept hyperlinking.
TheTrinity
quote:
Originally posted by Arbiter
The link you were looking for is this one. It's okay; these things are difficult to master, for some.
I usually charge for lessons, but I just couldn't bring myself to stand by and watch the spread of your inane ramblings impeded by a little inept hyperlinking.
thank you very much !! :)
EddieZilker
quote:
Originally posted by TheTrinity
regarding the link:
1. right next to the display time of this post, there is a box called "profile". click it.
2. At the top, it states:
Profile For TheTrinity // Search for all posts by this user.
