|
Did man really land on the moon? (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| a-aplz |
Gunna post this before I go to sleep...this is from an old thing I made up for research, so I'm gunna post it here.
Reasons to believe it was fake.
1. Shadows
2. No stars in the sky
3. When the moodlander tookoff to return the Earth, was no movement in the dust from the rocket engines
4. No atmosphere on the moon...yet the flag waved
5. Men bounced due to low gravity? No they just performed everything normal speed and slowed the film down 1/3 of it's normal speed (I believe that is what it was)
6. They did it becase it was a race to beat the Russians
8. If Neil Armstrong was the first man to walk on the moon, how did they get the cameras out side the lunar lander to film him walking?
Just look at the areas marked in yellow, and compare it to things in the list above.
The 'C' on the rock.
Now with 3 rocket engines on the bottom, wouldnt there be any disruption in the dust?
How did they manage to carry a vehicle in that thing if it was only built for two people and to carry a few essential supplies?
Those shadows look kinda cheesey don't they?
And these?
 
And why are the crosshairs in these images behind the objects?
Those are photos of the Lunar Lander landing on the moons surface. How did they manage to take photographs of it landing when there was nobody on the moon previously? And they have photographs of it departing..who stayed on the moon to film that? They just left some unlucky guy behind?
|
|
|
| Tranzmit |
| quote: | Originally posted by DjSuez
in a vacuum tank a man would explode, so that can't be it... |
correct me if i'm wrong but maybe thats what those funny pressurised suits were for ;) :p |
|
|
| Seventh City |
| alien abductions silly! |
|
|
| dr me |
Photo_bot_2k1 is right, the answers to questions like what a-aplz stated are "bloody" (australian slang) obvious. It doesn't even justify an answer.
end |
|
|
| infinity HiGH |
You people are stupid...anyone who believes this. I've read about this a year ago, and EVERY single reason that you people posted as to why its a hoax has been disproven. Try using common sense. How did they take pictures? Hmmm, since when is a person needed to take a picture? Ever hear of a computer? And as for there being no stars, anyone who's into photography and has followed the progress of the technology knows that when those pictures were taken, the focus was on the astronauts, and due to other ed up technological limitations (don't ask me, i read this a year ago) the stars didn't show up. I'm gonna try looking for that site, and hopefully I'll find it, so all of you people can go back to your basements and continue watching X-Files.
:rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Edit: Those shadows look kinda cheesy...? LOL...yeah, ok..."cheesy" |
|
|
| New Wave |
| quote: | Originally posted by caroline
After doing a study on this, it became known to the public that this in fact was a total hoax by NASA. Here are some reasons I recollected:
First off, the moon is about 260 degrees or more in temperture...the film used would not have survived.
Secondly, the pictures that were taken show techincal mistakes that should have been avoided in order to fool us like they wanted.
For the moon's only light source-the sun-there were shots taken that clearly show how out of line the shadows came out.
There was never any mention about the glorious stars that are visible when out of the earths atmosphereor - no visible shots at all
And the most obvious I read of was of a rock sitting on the side of a picture that had a very faint letter "C" written on it....a mistake that is said to be left by the props department.
So there you go kids...it's pure rubbish I tell you! Don't believe the hype. |
I saw all those pics in a magazine (X-factor or something)and they showed the mistakes :)
very funny to see :-) |
|
|
| ClubHarder |
| I saw a TV documentary a while back about all of this, showin all them "mistakes" on the photo graphs n stuff, and after readin all that stuff posted by a-aplz, I kinda think it was all a hoax after all :rolleyes: Jus my opinion tho, what the hell do I know ?? :conf: |
|
|
| Nadi |
| You and I both know the moon is made of cheese :P |
|
|
| a-aplz |
:p The photos are very convincing..I'm not saying I believe it's true.
And infinity HiGH...in 1969 they didn't have computers capable of taking such photos...for example how did they take the picture of the lunar lander landing on the moon if they were the first people there?
|
|
|
| Mail Man |
| quote: | Originally posted by Nadi
You and I both know the moon is made of cheese :P |
Walace and Gromit Fan ? :D
ClubHarder> i saw that thing on TV as well. They had a good point, why in all the pictures are there no stars?? i mean they are in space. |
|
|
| infinity HiGH |
thank you, thats the site i was looking for.
| quote: | | And infinity HiGH...in 1969 they didn't have computers capable of taking such photos...for example how did they take the picture of the lunar lander landing on the moon if they were the first people there? |
Ummmm, were you born yesterday? Before man landed on the moon, they've launched many humanless machines there...and computers and marchinery played a big role in each of those launches. Sure, they didn't have computers as advanced as today, but if the computers were capable of tracking a peice of metal thousands of kilometres away and making sure its on the right course, then I think they could take pictures by remote :rolleyes: |
|
|
|
|
