We truly appreciate feedback to strive to be better artists for those who appreciate music.
Thank You.
Deillon
Utter .
Really annoying to listen to.
nothingchannel
I searched your postings ... and to be quite frank, you dont really have too much good, or encouraging, to say about anyone. Are you happy where you live ?
Deillon
LOL, neither do you. All you do is post your ty tracks which don't seem to be improving, even after Richard Butler made an excellent point.
quote:
Originally posted by Richard Butler
I don't like the drop, but the intro part interesting, BUT, it's screaming out for the nasal filtered resonant quality to after a minute or so do a big high pass shift up then down to give a massive payload whereby all the nasal filter quality is removed to be replaced by full on unfiltered fun - you know with all the low end pounding thru unrestricted by that nasal notch filter thing.
However you did jack with this excellent feedback, so that's why i'm not going to waste any quality time I have on giving feedback to you.
I'm not here for support, I listen and post what I think. If you are not happy with it, maybe try and do something about your tracks.
Beatflux
This does sound bad.
Sinnica Hax
Hi Vincent,
Your tracks has a lot of potential and good things in them, I purchased "Ad Life" on iTunes, eventhough the mastering is mediocre to say the least, because you really have some good ideas in there, so my tip to you is to wrap the tracks up better to keep a good consistency so there wont be such contrast in changes into breakdowns/buildups etc, and same goes for the mastering, but Rome wasnt built in one day and you'll get there. (I hope)
Best regards, Fredrik
nothingchannel
Thanks Hax, but I would suggest a more current album. "Alchemy & Octane: The Remixes" or "Sound Anthology" ... both albums are on Juno.
I appreciated Richard Butler's comments, however ... that album "On (In Code)" is on (ALchemy & Octane: Volume 2 'The Yellow Album') is in the top 75 uplifting trance albums downloaded on Juno as of today. So if it works, and that what those who appreiciate the music like ... then I'll stick with that .... Amen, brother.
tehlord
If you don't like negative but constructive criticism and think that being placed in the top 75 on Juno is a better representation of quality than the opinion of people that know what they're doing then I'll politely suggest you right off.
The track you posted here is bad on every possible level. Actually no, it's terrible.
nothingchannel
Ahhh, Tehlord ... take me to your leader!
Storyteller
quote:
Originally posted by nothingchannel
I appreciated Richard Butler's comments, however ... that album "On (In Code)" is on (ALchemy & Octane: Volume 2 'The Yellow Album') is in the top 75 uplifting trance albums downloaded on Juno as of today. So if it works, and that what those who appreiciate the music like ... then I'll stick with that .... Amen, brother.
No offence but that's pretty much the same as the bottom 75 on Beatport and even worse than the bottom 75 on iTunes in terms of sales. Take the advice and go for the #1 on the charts.
nothingchannel
There's still a Beatport? I went to "Beatportal" last week. It's had one community posting in 3 months.
I can't believe the adverse opines here over the movement of the track "On (In Code)". I guess one person's highlight can be another's nightlight.
Storyteller
Best thing I could advise you to see what is wrong would be to compare your track to any one of your favorites in the same genre. In case you're unable to objectively compare your track to the track of your choice you would benefit from turning on your spectrum analyzer. As soon as you compare the spectrum analysis you will see where your tracks are lacking.
I'm quite confident most of the feedback you got on here could be fixed in under a couple of minutes. Unless the bass is all over the place I'm sure your tracks would benefit from this. Right now they sound nasal, distorted and poorly balanced since there is no real bass in there at all.
I've taken the liberty to check your Soundcloud. There's some tracks on there which unteresting parts to them. I can't deny I agree with Sinnica Hax, your tracks have potential. It's time to make it show. Try and take the feedback, no matter how harsh, as constructive criticism.
From listening to your tracks on Soundcloud I noticed sort of a similar imbalance on all tracks. It seems either your listening equipment or listening environment is far from ideal and might be the cause for the lack of better mixdown decisions. Again, I can't deny there's some talent hidden in each and every track you've made, it just doesn't shine through just yet.
