|
Obamacare (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ted Promo
WHAT IS LINDSEY LOHAN GONNA DO?? |
MORE COKE. |
|
|
| LAdazeNYnights |
There's no basis in the Constitution for this to be struck down. The founders even supported individual mandates in matters of insurance, having enacted 3 such policies. If this gets struck down then it'll be political in nature and nothing more.
//good thing that didn't happen
haha
roberts as swing vote - now that's special :p |
|
|
| Zharen |
| quote: | Originally posted by LAdazeNYnights
There's no basis in the Constitution for this to be struck down. The founders even supported individual mandates in matters of insurance, having enacted 3 such policies. If this gets struck down then it'll be political in nature and nothing more.
//good thing that didn't happen
haha
roberts as swing vote - now that's special :p |
Right, because they totally had insurance companies in the 1700's. |
|
|
| kadomony |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ted Promo
THERE ARE NO WORDS AND WORDS AREN'T EVEN MADE OF HEALTH AND HEALTH IS NOW A BAD |
damn straight. |
|
|
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by Zharen
Right, because they totally had insurance companies in the 1700's. |
They actually did, believe it or not. Ben Franklin started one of them (though his was for fire insurance). |
|
|
| Lira |
 |
|
|
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by Lira
|
:stongue: |
|
|
| Lilith |
| Finally, we can get all our slaves fixed for free in USA! |
|
|
| Arbiter |
| So the liberals get their individual mandate, which, even if it survives the upcoming election, will fail to achieve its intended purpose and which may very well prove irreparable in light of the constitutional restrictions introduced by this decision. In exchange, there are new and meaningful restrictions on the federal government's powers under the Commerce Clause and Spending Clause, achieved in a decision that liberals will loathe to repudiate later and under the guise of an at least somewhat nonpartisan decision. John Roberts is an astute man. |
|
|
| Chimney |
| From what I understand this is about providing citizens with a minimal amount of insurance. Why would anyone in the entire world be against this? |
|
|
|
|
