|
Going after teenage girls (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Nrg2Nfinit |
| really? a 14 year old asian looks like she is 5 |
|
|
| Jon_Snow |
| quote: | Originally posted by Chris Crossland
|
I would not want that chick french kissing me :nervous: |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| Too old for ya, huh IGK? |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
The best part it was 14, but 18 for sodomy (anal sodomy).
:wtf:
14 year old lezzies, a-ok, 14 year old gayboys not so much...
OHHH CAAAAANAAAADAAAAA |
What I like most about our Anal Sex laws (section 159 of the Criminal Code in case anyone cares) is that Anal Sex is legal if between two persons over 18 BUT if there is a third person in the room it is then illegal. Seriously, why the distinction? |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
Sodomy laws in general are just stupid. Luckily most states in the US have totally rid themselves of them...
A lot used to take the most broad definition of sodomy as well, oral sex was considered sodomy in a number of states (read the south). |
|
|
| itsamemario |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
i don't really see the appeal.
I suppose it gives those that would never have a chance at a good looking , fit , stylish financially independent women their age so they go for those that haven't realized that people that go for young girls are kinda pathetic.
There are girls that look better at 25. Smarter, funner to be around and way better in bed. This is like joining a kids soccer league and bragging about winning.
I guess everyone should feel like they are winning once in a while. If that is how you feel about it. I personally would feel kinda lame and pathetic. |
Okay, but make it teenage boys. What's your answer then? |
|
|
| itsamemario |
| quote: | Originally posted by Moral Hazard
What I like most about our Anal Sex laws (section 159 of the Criminal Code in case anyone cares) is that Anal Sex is legal if between two persons over 18 BUT if there is a third person in the room it is then illegal. Seriously, why the distinction? |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it says it's illegal if 'more than two persons are in the room'. Thus preventing those pesky free-for-all gay romps to pop up everywhere. I don't know if you're aware of this, but it was a pretty big problem back in the 60's. |
|
|
| Moral Hazard |
| quote: | Originally posted by itsamemario
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it says it's illegal if 'more than two persons are in the room'. Thus preventing those pesky free-for-all gay romps to pop up everywhere. I don't know if you're aware of this, but it was a pretty big problem back in the 60's. |
The exact verbiage is:
159. (1) Every person who engages in an act of anal intercourse is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction.
(2) Subsection (1) does not apply to any act engaged in, in private, between
(a) husband and wife, or
(b) any two persons, each of whom is eighteen years of age or more,
both of whom consent to the act.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2),
(a) an act shall be deemed not to have been engaged in in private if it is engaged in in a public place or if more than two persons take part or are present; and...
So if the intent was to prevent gay orgies in parks then they really only needed the whole "in a public place" part... the inclusion of the latter part is clearly to prevent group sex. I'm not sure why it's okay for me to my wife in the ass on my coffee table but if we invite the neighbours over to watch then I should go to prison. |
|
|
| itsamemario |
| Because it's UN-CHRISTIAN!! |
|
|
| aNYthing |
+7
Laws
Let's see how long humans will give a about age of conscent when society eventually falls. No, this ain't "the end is near" (although, we're one psychopath away from finding out and there are quite a few psychopaths out there, some with access to some serious WMDs).
But, if humans were thrown back to the future of total anarchy? You bet your ass no orifice of any vintage, color or origin is safe from a determined jizz shooter. Yes, even your grandma. |
|
|
|
|