|
New 9/11 Documentary, The peoples voice. (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| Finally..... The Rock has come back....to....BULL. |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by Spacey Orange
what's this jist of the argument/thesis? |
that sherlockcrash is one of life's failures and attaches himself to "secret knowledge" in attempt to feel special. likely due to being forced to lick his nanna as an adolescent. i found the argument pretty compelling. |
|
|
| netroM |
| quote: | Originally posted by SherlockCrash
the buildings fell in a way that defies the laws of physics. |
:stongue: |
|
|
| SherlockCrash |
| quote: | Originally posted by netroM
:stongue: |
Ofc I meant if it would have happen as they say it happened ;)
Here you got some examples when the demolition didn't go the way they planned. As you can see it is very important that the explosions takes care of the underlying floors before the top comes down, or else the building will fall to the side. So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives? |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| obviously all of the rebar in the wtc had nothing to do with it. |
|
|
| PivotTechno |
In endeavouring to form a cohesive argument, I take it you've thoroughly studied a large portion of the documentation debunking 9/11 conspiracy theory? Here's a good place to start:
http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html
...because if you haven't, then your "opinion" is founded entirely on an emotional - not a factual, rational - response. Barring your being there, or having lost friends or family because of it, if 12+ years after the fact you're still having such an emotional response to this event, you might want to consider moving on and trying to live in the present moment. All considered, it's not too bad.
You might also want to take the time to read these, as they're great references to assist in tapping into the logical part of your noggin:
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ass...erHigherRes.jpg
http://theconversation.com/no-youre...ur-opinion-9978 |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| quote: | Originally posted by SherlockCrash
So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives? |
because the twin towers had a steel "exoskeletan", with all the supporting steel of the building on the outside of structure, like this:
unlike the usual distribution that looks more like this:
you can see the real life example here:
why have you been unable to figure this out for yourself? |
|
|
| Lilith |
| quote: | Originally posted by SherlockCrash
So, is there still someone out there that thinks al qaida did it? :) |
So many years on, people still think that there aren't people in the world that hate the US so much, that they're willing to kill large amounts of Americans?
No really, they do hate the US that much.
It's not the average citizen's fault or even something they deserve. But something you should probably come to terms with the consequences of 60-70 or so years of external interference, sanctions, the odd bombing, assassinations, a war or two and other military shenanigans has these kind of repercussions. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by SherlockCrash
Here you got some examples when the demolition didn't go the way they planned. As you can see it is very important that the explosions takes care of the underlying floors before the top comes down, or else the building will fall to the side. So maybe pkcRAISTLIN can explain why and how the WTC buildings could fall straight down without the use of explosives? |
If the American government were willing to kill thousands of their own citizens by destroying two of the largest skyscrapers in the world, two civilian aircraft and also several surrounding buildings, why the would they care which direction the buildings fell? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| What’s even funnier about his ty example, is that the real demolition looks nothing like the towers. In true controlled demolition form, the building collapses from the bottom up, where obviously the towers fell from the impact zone down. |
|
|
| SherlockCrash |
| quote: | Originally posted by PivotTechno
In endeavouring to form a cohesive argument, I take it you've thoroughly studied a large portion of the documentation debunking 9/11 conspiracy theory? Here's a good place to start:
http://www.911myths.com/indexold.html
...because if you haven't, then your "opinion" is founded entirely on an emotional - not a factual, rational - response. Barring your being there, or having lost friends or family because of it, if 12+ years after the fact you're still having such an emotional response to this event, you might want to consider moving on and trying to live in the present moment. All considered, it's not too bad.
You might also want to take the time to read these, as they're great references to assist in tapping into the logical part of your noggin:
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ass...erHigherRes.jpg
http://theconversation.com/no-youre...ur-opinion-9978 |
Haha emotional response, good one. The only persons having a emotional response in this thread is those answering me with attacks.
I have looked at information from both sides, and it is totally clear for me that the official story is a fairytale.
Maybe you should study those sites yourself? |
|
|
|
|
