|
Paulino software can't do that challenge derp took er jobs
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Looney4Clooney |
Ok Paulino,
So tentively accept.
Post your challenge,
The criteria for winning,
And 3 judges to judge. |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| FOr fuks sake just do it |
|
|
| djnitride |
This is now the official L4C and Paulino talk thread.
Talking outside of this thread will result in an $100 fine :p |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| Oh let everyone be the judge. |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| I never back down from someone who starts to rip their mouth open and come out call people fuking hoarders. Wait this is TA you can say whatever am i right? |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
what is the rush
state the rules.
state the criteria for winning.
i want to make sure you have no wiggle room.
Your argument is that software can't do it.
So unless you have cold feet, i think i'pm being pretty reasonable. I['m not paying 500 into something that hasn't been defined. Either comply or concede.
nothing left to say. PM me when you've posted your challenge here in more concrete terms. |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| YOu keep mumbling out of your ass thinking i'll back down soon. I never will bitch. You keep trying to make new rules with every new post. just stick to your first one. I don't want anything in return except saying your paulino's bitch in your signature. |
|
|
| tehlord |
| quote: | Originally posted by PaULiN0
Oh let everyone be the judge. |
I've been judging you all for years |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by tehlord
I've been judging you all for years |
I sentence you to hardware correctional facility to maximum of 100 plus years. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| quote: | Originally posted by PaULiN0
YOu keep mumbling out of your ass thinking i'll back down soon. I never will bitch. You keep trying to make new rules with every new post. just stick to your first one. I don't want anything in return except saying your paulino's bitch in your signature. |
we haven't stated any rules.
I said i would accept if you define your challenge in a more concrete way.
very simple
define the challenge.
define the criteria for winning
and pick 3 people to judge if that criteria is met.
this is in no way in my advantage. it is to make sure you have no wiggle room.
If you can't agree to that, then you aren't really that confident and you getting cold feet. |
|
|
| PaULiN0 |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
we haven't stated any rules.
I said i would accept if you define your challenge in a more concrete way.
very simple
define the challenge.
define the criteria for winning
and pick 3 people to judge if that criteria is met.
this is in no way in my advantage. it is to make sure you have no wiggle room.
If you can't agree to that, then you aren't really that confident and you getting cold feet. |
Of course i'm confident, why wouldn't I be.
The challenge is right there in your face, if you can exactly recreate it then you loose.
You reverse engineer with whatever software you use fm8 doesn't matter than you win.
The more judges the better. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
1. define the challenge.
2. criteria to win
3. who determines if criteria is met. \
how is this not reasonable. The fact you won't do this is a little ing sketchy. |
|
|
|
|
