|
Warmth (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Raphie |
your mileage may vary. I'm pretty sure I can put together your stems beyond a level of warmth you ever thought possible.
We can take this to the test if you like, breakdown one of your tracks in 4 or 5 stems and we do a mix off, then we let the guys here decide which one sounds most warm / open and amazing :D
You can also come you my studio once and you can experience yourself how far you can stretch warmth.
I'm not sure I get your cook kitchen thing, prof cooks do have preferences in kitchens. a nice stream oven get's you very different results than a standard microwave, you get that right? |
|
|
| inversoundzzz |
| seriously..the whole itb vs otb things is not even about the sound quality..i'd rather use soft synths than real ones...they sound just as good and theyre way more pratical..for performance that another thing....but studio? you make great quality music without any analog gear whatsoever. the real argument of otb vs itb is not about sound quality it's about workflow...and performance style.....working only in a daw....is not good obviously. the daw mindset...is all about arrangment....especially if you dont use live. it puts you ina na arrangment song composition focus....whether you ralize it or not...it's subconscious...this is not how good dance music gets created....yes you can make the song exactly 128 bars long and have each break come at the exact right time...but the song will be static....because your not making music you clicking a mouse as the midi plays the notes....the best electonica is made using live sequencing....real knobs real faders....simple track count...simple tracks...but with lots of evolving textures...simple tracks but long evolutins of suond....knob tweaking and a slower tempo....125 at most...because you cant sequence songs live that are much hfaster than that, and theres no groove. this is my thoughts as of this point any way....maybe you might find them interesting...and this is not a DJ perspective clearly....hey DJing you can have tracks 200 bpm because there already canned for you.... |
|
|
| Raphie |
No, It's vey much about sound quality, both sources and processing.
I do agree that one should be able to make half decent tracks fully ITB.
But OTB is a whole different universe. This is seperate from a workflow discussion. I've pissed off the whole software crew at Gearslutz posting some API2500 with Lindell PEX500 EQ processed files
also provided the source files, asked them if they could match it.
topic on fire :D
We can do it here too, if you feel like it.
both plugins can be demoed for free.
Just out of interest what kind of high-end gear do you currently own?
Again I'm not saying you can't get half decent results with software only, but clean software tracks, processed through a balanced outboard chain just sounds so much better than any ITB plugin chain that you stack on top.
| quote: | Originally posted by inversoundzzz
seriously..the whole itb vs otb things is not even about the sound quality..i'd rather use soft synths than real ones...they sound just as good and theyre way more pratical..for performance that another thing....but studio? you make great quality music without any analog gear whatsoever. the real argument of otb vs itb is not about sound quality it's about workflow...and performance style.....working only in a daw....is not good obviously. the daw mindset...is all about arrangment....especially if you dont use live. it puts you ina na arrangment song composition focus....whether you ralize it or not...it's subconscious...this is not how good dance music gets created....yes you can make the song exactly 128 bars long and have each break come at the exact right time...but the song will be static....because your not making music you clicking a mouse as the midi plays the notes....the best electonica is made using live sequencing....real knobs real faders....simple track count...simple tracks...but with lots of evolving textures...simple tracks but long evolutins of suond....knob tweaking and a slower tempo....125 at most...because you cant sequence songs live that are much hfaster than that, and theres no groove. this is my thoughts as of this point any way....maybe you might find them interesting...and this is not a DJ perspective clearly....hey DJing you can have tracks 200 bpm because there already canned for you.... |
|
|
|
| inversoundzzz |
lol, it's all in your mind....lmao.....
actually speaking gearsluts, i just posted that post from here as a new thread omg lmao....
you know what youre doing man, as a studio guy... im talking more from a live performance perspective here. im not a studio engineer, im a musician...so Im not arguing over studio miniutia..i believe you. |
|
|
| Raphie |
Good :D
But seriously, I do agree with your statement above, tweaking without a screen does a lot to the recording.
But I guess what i'm trying to say is that there are a lot of different perspectives:
- what music do you like
- what kind of sound do you like, warm, thin, polished, raw etc |
|
|
| Storyteller |
| quote: | Originally posted by Raphie
I'm not sure I get your cook kitchen thing, prof cooks do have preferences in kitchens. a nice stream oven get's you very different results than a standard microwave, you get that right? |
But that doesn't necessarily mean people with the better gear automatically produce better results ;). Robert Babicz for instance, his tracks can sound warm as with his famed analogue approach, his mixdowns are incredibly tight but still most of his productions make me feel dead inside. Warmth is nice but not should at all a goal in itself.
I've never invested in something consiously to actively persue warmth in my own productions and I don't really mind either. Especially right now when I put creating my own music on the backburner (to stay in the realms of cooking).
It's just your statement about digital warmth being an oxymoron. Just because you haven't managed to figure it out (which applies to me as well) doesn't mean it does not exist. |
|
|
| Raphie |
Agreed but that's a different discussion
I'm talking warmth / absolute sound quality from an engineering perspective, not whether the productions themselves are even remotely interesting. You can not offset one with the other.
Just to be clear I HAVE figured out the full potential of the current plugins available. In general i prefer plugins for surgical work, much more precise than analogue, however for vibe, or harmonics analogue is still king. Talking purely semantecs, you might be right that there is still untapped potential in digital, not yet captured in plugins. Once it's there i'm pretty sure I'll embrace it.
I'm not against digital, or an analogue fetishist. I'm working hybrid, but I do recognize horses for courses |
|
|
| Raphie |
| quote: | Originally posted by inversoundzzz
lol, it's all in your mind....lmao.....
actually speaking gearsluts, i just posted that post from here as a new thread omg lmao....
you know what youre doing man, as a studio guy... im talking more from a live performance perspective here. im not a studio engineer, im a musician...so Im not arguing over studio miniutia..i believe you. |
That went well :D https://www.gearslutz.com/board/ele...t-workflow.html
Don't want to be pain, but again, what gear do you own? please shoot a pic with a paper reading TA2015 on top of it
you sound like someone who started ITB and spend to much time on forums absorbing other ITB guys opinions. Get some real world experience first. And then re-read what you have been posting above.
Ofcourse you can blow us all away with your outboard collection which makes your opinion an informed one, an unconventional one, but informed...
Again I'm not saying ITB is bad or something, just saying analogue stretches a lot further depending on what you're after ofcourse. |
|
|
| tehlord |
| quote: | Originally posted by inversoundzzz
im not a studio engineer |
No. No you most certainly are not. |
|
|
| TranceElevation |
Been lurking this like mad.
Uh la la la. |
|
|
| TranceElevation |
| I have a question for bluffmunkey. |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| Radiators work too. And thick curtains. |
|
|
|
|
