|
Speaking of Sexual Assault (pg. 3)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| pkcRAISTLIN |
SVU did an episode based on this (i reckon).
| quote: | Originally posted by Silky Johnson
What's with all the goddamn rapists these days? |
i know, right? i say this all the time. they're all at it. |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
Let's just get to page 2 then.
Cosby sweater, bad. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
This is page 2.
15PPP4LIFE. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
Compared to the US it is incredibly strict. Everything besides real children in sex acts in photos/videos is considered protected speech. |
Why the would anyone who isn't a paedophile want to read or write erotic fiction involving a child? |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| I enjoyed Lolita, and I don't kids. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
Try to keep up Jay.
| quote: | Originally posted by Joss Weatherby
I mean like blatant sex stories where the only point is sex. |
|
|
|
| Lews |
I will say, actually, that the UK free speech laws aren't as open as in America. I was absolutely shocked two years ago when I read about a guy going to jail for an offensive joke on Twitter. The joke was apparently so horrible that the press wasn't allowed to quote it and he went to prison for a few years :wtf: That would never happen in the States. And yeah, I think it involved a minor and sex.
Obviously the UK is one of the freest-speaking countries in the world, just not as much as the US, which is a bit odd. |
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Try to keep up Jay. |
I never read his posts. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Why the would anyone who isn't a paedophile want to read or write erotic fiction involving a child? |
I don't know, but they probably shouldn't go to jail for it since it harms no one and involves nothing actually happening in the real world.
Just like people shouldn't go to jail for child porn for drawings of Bart and Lisa from the Simpsons ing or some ridiculous like that. It isn't real, so how can there be a crime. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| You could certainly argue it encourages the treatment of children as sexual objects though. We're talking specifically here about fiction written for no other purpose than causing sexual arousal. Towards children. You should know as well as anyone that pornography can influence sexual taste and behaviour. Of all the things to highlight as problematic about freedom of speech in the UK, this should be very bottom of the list. |
|
|
| Joss Weatherby |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
Of all the things to highlight as problematic about freedom of speech in the UK, this should be very bottom of the list. |
Um, I highlighted it because it was relevant to the point I was making.
Also you can make the same argument, with clinical backing I am sure, that fake pornography in cases such as pedophilia actually satiates desires and gives deviants a safe outlet for their urges. If they have the choice between wanking it to some text by another pervert about someone who isn't real and has no possibility of harming anything or anyone or seeking out a real child to have the same sexual release then I think the choice is clear.
Furthermore making the statement that porn influences behavior is highly subject and pretty drastic. For example, just because someone watches rape porn or is in to rape play doesn't mean they are going to go out and actually rape someone or that they want to be raped in real life. |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| This isn't the first time Nou has defended child pornography. And he wants us to believe he's not a rapist, lol. |
|
|
|
|
