|
Beatport 45% off today (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| SYSTEM-J |
| Amazon MP3s are VBR quality, so if you think you're going to play the tracks out on a good soundsystem you probably want the 320-or-better of Beatport. Personally I do buy most tracks on Amazon MP3, especially stuff for my ambient sets. Chill out DJs don't get to play on top spec soundsystems. |
|
|
| Paradox Lost |
| quote: | Originally posted by Woony
That's really the biggest thing that I hate about Beatport, they act like the care about the state of DJing but they heavily discourage people from playing .wavs with their ing absurd lossless fees. |
Or they figure they could make them sellable through advertising banners like "deliver the highest quality to your fans." I used to not touch anything that wasn't a .wav, until I began imagining the obscene cost and space requirements of owning all the music I wanted in .wav format. |
|
|
| Woony |
Obviously, they make more money this way, but bandwith is so cheap these days that charging anything extra for lossless is a joke. It's a practice from last decade that somehow made it's way into 2014.
Bandcamp gives you whatever format you want for the same price and i'm very happy that more and more labels are using them, the only advantage that Beatport has is that their storefront is much better for digging and keeping up with new releases. |
|
|
| paulversuspaul |
| quote: | Originally posted by Woony
Obviously, they make more money this way, but bandwith is so cheap these days that charging anything extra for lossless is a joke. It's a practice from last decade that somehow made it's way into 2014.
|
Storage is expensive. I have run into issues with storage costs for my own company (i do genomics work) that made me realize how every bit counts as far as storage is concerned. Its probably why amazon doesn't sell lossless actually, since it would cut into their margin. |
|
|
| Woony |
If they do sell lossless though (ie. Beatport), it's stored on their servers anyways.
Amazon sells vbr because regular people don't care or don't want lossless. Don't they run the Azure cloud service? I doubt they'd care about a bit of extra data from their music service. I wouldn't be surprised if they have the lossless they receive from the labels still lying around somewhere anyways. |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| If anyone fancies chancing their arm, type STEP3 in as your discount today and see what happens. |
|
|
| Trance-M |
| quote: | Originally posted by SYSTEM-J
If anyone fancies chancing their arm, type STEP3 in as your discount today and see what happens. |
Nothing over here: "You cannot redeem this code."
But I got the step3 code for 50%: P71RG3 but that shouldn't work if you didn't use step1 and step2. |
|
|
| meriter |
| quote: | Originally posted by Woony
Mp3s should be same quality, but I don't think Amazon sells lossless? That's really the biggest thing that I hate about Beatport, they act like the care about the state of DJing but they heavily discourage people from playing .wavs with their ing absurd lossless fees. |
This is a great point.. I still wonder how much of that actually goes to the artist. The whole thing seems like a total racket to me |
|
|
| Innocence Lost |
| It sucks you could only use musiclover just once. |
|
|
| planetaryplayer |
| i just typed step3 in coupons (my crate was at 127) and it took 50% off and my bill ended up being 63$ |
|
|
| SYSTEM-J |
| Yeah, it still seems to be working. I've used it four times now. |
|
|
| sensorium |
| I wanted to buy a bunch of progressive songs from 2003-2007 but I couldn't because out of the 24 hours I couldn't really make a decent search after work. Next year, maybe. :stongue: |
|
|
|
|
