|
why do people believe in science? (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
you are trying to disrupt a conversation between two intelligent beings. two parties which know both the importance of the conversation, and the discreet method in which it is applied. through secret codes, sometimes done too well, so much so that it can confuse both the parties at the same time. a code that changes with each new additional statement, like a painting drawn upside down only to be flipped and the answer then realized.
a conversation much too hard for simpletons to understand the necessity, importance and urgency which it can or cannot lack.
you trying to take part of this conversation reminds me of a child
that walks in the middle of a porno film, stunned, yet you feel the need to react in some way. and so thinking that the penis is a lollipop you try to grab it, only to be scarred for life thereafter.
i would warn against your need to disrupt what you cannot possibly understand unless revealed to you, and even then you will still be confused for the rest of your life. you want to be part of something that you will never be part of, and will never understand. but you still try, because your over-inflated ego tells you to.
because you think its "cool" to be the "cool guy".
i just felt it necessary that telling you to
mind your own ing business
was not descriptive enough for you to understand. |
i originally posted this in another thread.
before all you get too excited about some stupid bitch stealing my quote. |
|
|
| Serial Killer |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
what about baby jesus? |
|
|
|
| Dykes_on_Jay |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
i originally posted this in another thread.
before all you get too excited about some stupid bitch stealing my quote. |
She's actually being more clever than you winston. |
|
|
| colonelcrisp |
| quote: | Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN
you wouldn't know science if it was holding you down and tongue punching your fart box. |
fixed for accuracy |
|
|
| Silky Johnson |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
i originally posted this in another thread.
before all you get too excited about some stupid bitch stealing my quote. |
I would warn against your need to disrupt what you cannot possibly understand unless revealed to you, and even then you will still be confused for the rest of your life.
You want to be part of something that you will never be part of, and will never understand. But you still try, because your over-inflated ego tells you to.
Because you think its "cool" to be the "cool guy". |
|
|
| Vector A |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
i originally posted this in another thread.
before all you get too excited about some stupid bitch stealing my quote. |
i originally posted this in another thread.
before all you get too excited about some stupid bitch stealing my quote. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
it allows me to pump my penis with viagra and get an erection. - science -
The scientific method is a philosophy of falsification. It aims at finding better ways. Nothing you mentioned undermines it. All those artificial psychedelic drugs that make you stupid are thanks to science. Just like a bathtub full of water and a toaster with you in it will have predictable effects.
science |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
it allows me to pump my penis with viagra and get an erection. - science -
The scientific method is a philosophy of falsification. It aims at finding better ways. Nothing you mentioned undermines it. All those artificial psychedelic drugs that make you stupid are thanks to science. Just like a bathtub full of water and a toaster with you in it will have predictable effects.
science |
you're making assumptions.
"predictable effects" do not apply to my existence. |
|
|
| Lews |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
before you comment.
the scientific method does not take into account empiricism in its pure form. empiricism is learning from experience, this means that emotions, instincts, the supernatural, the spiritual, all have to be taken into consideration when trying to understand objective reality.
the scientific method is a mockery to empiricism and philosophy.
you cant make the assumptions that physical senses and physical observations can describe a universe which has not been proven to be only physical |
I think you need to read some philosophy of science. The assumption is not that the physical senses and physical observations can describe ALL of the universe, but that it can describe all physical parts of it.
Many philosophers of science will quite happily agree that the common positivist approach to science (which you are calling the Scientific Method) does not describe all of reality, as it cannot do so. Nor, really, can any approach to science.
However, the positivist approach is quite good at discovering many partial truths of reality - truths which are very helpful in explaining the world better.
Anyone who claims science is perfect is deluded, yet no serious philosopher of science would make such a claim.
Tl;Dr : you're attacking a strawman conception of science. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| quote: | Originally posted by 0100306660SAS
you're making assumptions.
"predictable effects" do not apply to my existence. |
having a retard drop in and out every few months here is actually quite predictable. |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
the fact remains that no scientific theory has every been proven correct.
technology is made through engineering.
the gap between theoretical science and applied engineering, is much wider than anyone realizes.
no scientific theory applied directly into an experiment has resulted in any discovery.
everything you see, technology, etc that has been man made has been through
TRIAL AND ERROR.
the will of humanity causes inventions. not their understanding. |
|
|
|
|
