|
Conrad Hilton & Fox News (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ RANN
Lol, this thread makes me laugh.
None of you have a ing clue what you're talking about. There's plenty of people born in wealth that do something with it and often out perform the generation that gave them the headstart, so hating on that just is really just an emo angst for being born poor.
Deal with it. |
THE RICH. KILL THEM ALL.
AND YOU FOR trying to DEFEND THEM. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
Surely a critical thinker as you've demonstrated time and again realizes that money doesn't make you rich in say friends. Seems like you are jelly.
What is your definition of rich ? I thought you were the most superior person on this planet. Get rich and use that money to make people not rich.
Do you have any hobbies ? |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
Surely a critical thinker as you've demonstrated time and again realizes that money doesn't make you rich in say friends. Seems like you are jelly.
What is your definition of rich ? I thought you were the most superior person on this planet. Get rich and use that money to make people not rich.
Do you have any hobbies ? |
//rich. having wealth or great possessions; abundantly supplied with resources, means, or funds; wealthy: a rich man; a rich nation. having wealth or valuable resources//
its directly related to money and material possessions.
my hobbies is breaking the 666 seals needed for the apocalypse. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
you defined rich by using terms that can be applied to a house cat.
Well if you can't define rich, and since you aren't one of them, perhaps you could describe how you aren't rich. I don't think you could. But do have a go. |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
you defined rich by using terms that can be applied to a house cat.
Well if you can't define rich, and since you aren't one of them, perhaps you could describe how you aren't rich. I don't think you could. But do have a go. |
i provided you with the dictionary definition.
do explain your motive for arguing against a formally accepted dictionary definition.
this should be good. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
You did.
the problem is that because of the lack of actual metrics, you technically fit it. How does that make you feel ? If you are rich, perhaps you should not be all stabby ?
You seem to not understand a relative concept and hating something that is not tangible and how it sounds really ing silly form the person who claims to be the ultimate whatever the person on this planet.
Duning Krueger pretty much explains your plane of self awareness. Or just imagine that kid from six sense but substitute idiots for ghosts that don't know they are ghosts. That kid is pointing right at you. Dumbs that don't know they are dumb s. |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
You did.
the problem is that because of the lack of actual metrics, you technically fit it. How does that make you feel ? If you are rich, perhaps you should not be all stabby ?
You seem to not understand a relative concept and hating something that is not tangible and how it sounds really ing silly form the person who claims to be the ultimate whatever the person on this planet.
Duning Krueger pretty much explains your plane of self awareness. Or just imagine that kid from six sense but substitute idiots for ghosts that don't know they are ghosts. That kid is pointing right at you. Dumbs that don't know they are dumb s. |
my reference, definition and usage of the word was pretty self-explanatory.
you keep getting into these alternate head games which arent even that good.
think of something better. you lost this round pretty badly. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
it was.
and it applies to you.
Ever single criterion you pretty much fit.
I'm not debating your definition. I'm questioning your self hate. You hate rich people. You are rich. You can't prove other wise given your terms of what is rich. You struggle and i respect that. |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
it was.
and it applies to you.
Ever single criterion you pretty much fit.
I'm not debating your definition. I'm questioning your self hate. You hate rich people. You are rich. You can't prove other wise given your terms of what is rich. You struggle and i respect that. |
circular logic only works if youre in the circle. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
I asked a question. You inferred logic. I am just wondering why you hate rich people given that your definition of what is rich includes you. If you disagree with the assumption in the question, then explain why you aren't rich with your definition as it relates to your means.
I'm not asking for much. I mean this is all assuming you aren't an idiot. I'm extending you that benefit. Feel free to relinquish it. Idiots have a purpose. |
|
|
| 0100306660SAS |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
I asked a question. You inferred logic. I am just wondering why you hate rich people given that your definition of what is rich includes you. If you disagree with the assumption in the question, then explain why you aren't rich with your definition as it relates to your means.
I'm not asking for much. I mean this is all assuming you aren't an idiot. I'm extending you that benefit. Feel free to relinquish it. Idiots have a purpose. |
have you had your brain checked for retardation yet?
you should seriously go do that. |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| I take if you can't answer the question. Fair enough. I respect your tenacity. Like those lemmings that never stop trying. Hold on to that. |
|
|
|
|
