|
Sadness, Sin, and Temptation - New psychology on the human condition (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Jon_Snow |
Beard plus hat
Beard plus hat |
|
|
| AnotherWay83 |
| teachings of tanya? shiiiiiiiit. i dated a stripper named tanya once, she sure did teach me a lot :D |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| quote: | Originally posted by enydo
lol what's up with that dude's dumb hat and beard? |
In the first minute ,
He claims
guilt is the root of all sadness.
therapists are doctors.
that guilt cannot be secular.
how can you be so gullible. Most sane priests rabbis would probably consider this guy ing nuts. |
|
|
| AlphaStarred |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
that guilt cannot be secular. |
What do you mean? |
|
|
| Mr.Mystery |
| quote: | Originally posted by AlphaStarred
What do you mean? |
In laymen's terms: you're a dunce. |
|
|
| Jon_Snow |
| quote: | Originally posted by Mr.Mystery
In laymen's terms: you're a dunce. |
:stongue:
Can someone make him a plaque for his wall that he can refer to every time he has question? |
|
|
| AlphaStarred |
| So if anyone has watched it, what about it don't you agree with? |
|
|
| pkcRAISTLIN |
| if only the solution really had been final. |
|
|
| Jon_Snow |
 |
|
|
| Looney4Clooney |
| quote: | Originally posted by AlphaStarred
So if anyone has watched it, what about it don't you agree with? |
He makes an argument against something he doesn't remotely understand. He uses the same sort of cherry picking and convenient omition of facts climate change and evolution deniers do. His words would resonate with the a certain type of epsilon that has to believe in something because they ed up something in someone way that has cornered themselves into broke part of quite possibly the unseixeist cult. Or what ever word you use to describe it,I
I've met 4 survivors and read countless accounts of the Jews surviving holocaust and how they became secular after that ordeal.
Maybe you should google Epicurus' great quote on God. |
|
|
| AlphaStarred |
| quote: | Originally posted by Looney4Clooney
He makes an argument against something he doesn't remotely understand. He uses the same sort of cherry picking and convenient omition of facts climate change and evolution deniers do. His words would resonate with the a certain type of epsilon that has to believe in something because they ed up something in someone way that has cornered themselves into broke part of quite possibly the unseixeist cult. Or what ever word you use to describe it... |
| quote: | Originally posted by AlphaStarred
...what about it don't you agree with? |
|
|
|
|
|
