Weird. Exactly the same at Junodownload. But I've the impression that the first track of 8:43 is at a much better quality than the other track which is 9:something but otherwise sounds the same. Bloody mess sometimes these shops and those -quality back catalogues
On Discogs someone already pointed out the one track appears to be a shorter edit of the longer Urban Jungle mix in Dec 2014. Where do I go to point out this kind of problems?
the-sixth
I emailed beatport but yeah it is a bloody mess the whole thing. Shame as that ET mix is so good