|
Best Striker In England
|
View this Thread in Original format
| ChrisT |
| Who would you say is the best striker in the country? |
|
|
| King of Clubs |
| Ruud van Nistelrooy and Henry. I can't decide which one is better. They are very different, but both world class! |
|
|
| ChrisT |
| Between those 2 i would say Henry, but shearer is better!!!!!!!:) :) :) :) :) :) |
|
|
| DuMonde TrAnCeR |
nistelrooy is pretty poor. i can think of many other strikers, if they had man utd's midfield behind them, wud score as many goals. i mean dwight yorke was pretty and he managed to bag them all the time.
id say shearer is the best striker, but he isnt as fast as he used to be so gets onto less chances, but still is the best all roudn stronger.
henry is almost as good finisher, but is very fast and playsfor arsenal, so he has and advantage over sheaer, but isnt as good a striker/header/reader of the game IMO |
|
|
| jploveparade |
:cool: |
|
|
| King of Clubs |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dumonde Trancer
nistelrooy is pretty poor. i can think of many other strikers, if they had man utd's midfield behind them, wud score as many goals. i mean dwight yorke was pretty and he managed to bag them all the time.
id say shearer is the best striker, but he isnt as fast as he used to be so gets onto less chances, but still is the best all roudn stronger.
|
Shearer is good, England would have had plenty of use for him in the World Cup if he hadn't retired. But he's not as dangerous as he used to be.
You can't call van Nistelrooy poor. A poor striker doesn't do 50 goals in 70 games at this level. A world class striker does that. |
|
|
| SugarShack |
| Henry is the best striker in the league:D |
|
|
| shoXx |
| quote: | Originally posted by SugarShack
Henry is the best striker in the league:D |
Werd! |
|
|
| ChrisT |
| and wot does WERD mean? :conf: |
|
|
| Dj-HordasH |
| c-rap music lingo for 'right on' |
|
|
|
|
