|
USA x IRAQ
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Furel |
| Should George Bush attack Sadam Hussein? |
|
|
| TranceBunnY |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ Fundamental
No |
i second that |
|
|
| Blik |
this one needs to be edited I think
I think that the US is allowed to bomb IF they have weapons of mass destruction. Otherwise a definate NO-NO |
|
|
| SugarShack |
| I dont give a damn!! |
|
|
| Furel |
| I think they should only go into war if Hussein failures to accept the UNO inspectors. Cause I think that if he send those inspectors home or do let them do their job, is because hes hidding something. But so far, what I have heard is that he is cooperating with UNO soldiers. |
|
|
| Coup |
| lol this argument aint gona happen in my forum! :p |
|
|
| DrUg_Tit0 |
If Saddam has WOMD, and if he refuses to destroy them, and if the UN agrees, then yes.
Otherwise, no. |
|
|
| Yoepus |
| I don't see how anyone can disagree with "bombing Saddam's ass". I think the world would be a better place without "Saddam's ass", and a lot less dirty and smelly.:thepirate |
|
|
| IronDragon |
If WOMD are found (and not destroyed immediately) or Iraq blatantly attempts to compromise the weapons inspections (which any reasonabe person would surmise is tantamount to admitting they have WOMD) then yes.
Otherwise no |
|
|
|
|
