|
Paul van Dyk Adolph Hitler. (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by KLINGKLANG77
and yours???? there are many different ways, war is not the answer!
BTW- you're is you are.. your is posessive. i see now what i am dealing with.
i mean come on spelling, punctuation marks etc. i can deal with...
thus this argument is not worth dealing with. i see we have tiesto14 2 we are dealing with here. |
You can tell all that from one grammatical error? Btw, you missed a comma :). |
|
|
| ahlamalek |
"You are either with us, or against us!" - George "idiot" Bush.
The solution: Bomb PVD since he's a terrorist and German, how convienient! |
|
|
| mr. poopyhead |
freeflytim: by your logic, america must've supported adolph hitler from 1939-1942 and changed their minds after pearl harbour....
obviously that's skewed logic... |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by mr. poopyhead
freeflytim: by your logic, america must've supported adolph hitler from 1939-1942 and changed their minds after pearl harbour....
obviously that's skewed logic... |
Not quite, America must have supported Hitler in 1933-35, became opposed to him in 1936 during the beginning of aggression and appeasement, gone to war with Hitler in the 1939 invasion of Poland, sign a truce and disarmed hin in 1941, etc., etc., etc. |
|
|
| tranceaholic |
| i said it a million times already saving iraq makes about only 10% why the us gone to war..i know lot of people agree with me even pro war people...why dont people read the threads and the discussions we have. |
|
|
| fastmp3 |
| i hope Starf0x reads this thread and slaps the out of you |
|
|
| Starfox |
| wtf. are you dense? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
|
|
| jdat |
you're entitled to an opinion, but presenting the things in such a way is firstly wrong and secondly totally unfounded!
talk to pvd himself and then you'll understand why he doesn't want war :whip: :whip: :whip: |
|
|
| mr. poopyhead |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Not quite, America must have supported Hitler in 1933-35, became opposed to him in 1936 during the beginning of aggression and appeasement, gone to war with Hitler in the 1939 invasion of Poland, sign a truce and disarmed him in 1941, etc., etc., etc. |
huh? america didnt' join the war til 1942... meh... i think you somehow got my point about stupid logic, haha. |
|
|
| Nrg2Nfinit |
war is baaaaaaaaaaaaad
hehe.. sorry i just wanted to say that.. but everyone is entitled to their own opinion.. i personally think that the US has no business in iraq..since they havent even proved that the iraqis have chemical weapons yet.. and even if they do.. its a world issue .. not a US issue..
when people are against war .. they are against the unescessary killing of people.. war leads to more war.. history shows it.. why not try to find another solution?
I agree with PVD and for those who dont .. give him some respect and credibility for he has his own opinion just like you |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by mr. poopyhead
huh? america didnt' join the war til 1942... meh... i think you somehow got my point about stupid logic, haha. |
Actually 1941. I'm just going along with your hitler analogy. To correctly reflect the war in Iraq the US would have had to have gone to war with hitler in 1936 ... then signed a truce agreement, etc. Whatever it's too confusing hehe. |
|
|
| JohnSmith |
| wow, this just reaffirms how AWESOME Paul Van Dyk really is. |
|
|
|
|
