return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: [1] 2 
Why?
View this Thread in Original format
DrummeRaver86
I was thinking about this one....

Why is the US allowed to have weapons of mass destruction (i.e. A rather large nuclear arsenal and chemical weapons.)? Actually, why should any country have wepaons of mass destruction? Iraq damn well shouldn't have em, but Israel shoudn't either. The US shouldn't have em, but Russia shouldn't either. What do you think the world woul be like if EVERY SINGLE WMD was destroyed? Looks nice.....
ahlamalek
Of course, you are entirely right! But then it wouldn't adhere to the double standards mentality so important to the US administration.
JohnSmith
well.. i can see the concept. the same reason the police are allowed to have guns in the UK but nobody else is.

Apparently, someone has to have WMD, to make sure that no rogue country uses them for it's own personal gain. Unfortunately, the country that is supposed to be helping maintain peace has succumbed to corruption, and is now the rogue state that needs to be stopped from it's imperialism.
JudgeJulez
quote:
Originally posted by JohnSmith
well.. i can see the concept. the same reason the police are allowed to have guns in the UK but nobody else is.

Apparently, someone has to have WMD, to make sure that no rogue country uses them for it's own personal gain. Unfortunately, the country that is supposed to be helping maintain peace has succumbed to corruption, and is now the rogue state that needs to be stopped from it's imperialism.


hehehe....kind of like the old axiom "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely."
JM
quote:
Originally posted by JohnSmith
well.. i can see the concept. the same reason the police are allowed to have guns in the UK but nobody else is.

Apparently, someone has to have WMD, to make sure that no rogue country uses them for it's own personal gain. Unfortunately, the country that is supposed to be helping maintain peace has succumbed to corruption, and is now the rogue state that needs to be stopped from it's imperialism.


what imperialism? u dont see the US soldiers dropping atomic bombs over baghdad do you? or using chemicals in its bombs.

you all must think saddam is an ethical and just man

:rolleyes:

>JM<
kal007
All countries are corrupt.
occrider
Well if Iraq wasn't prohibited from having WOMDs then they would be allowed to have them. The UN doesn't prohibit nations from possessing chemical weapons. However, as a condition of truce Iraq signed an agreement saying they would not have any.

And the reason why countries will always have chemical weapons ... is because the other guy has them.
LiquidX
quote:
Originally posted by JM
what imperialism? u dont see the US soldiers dropping atomic bombs over baghdad do you? or using chemicals in its bombs.

you all must think saddam is an ethical and just man

:rolleyes:

>JM<


You forgot about that newly made bomb that the US is planning on dropping on Iraq??!
occrider
quote:
Originally posted by LiquidX
You forgot about that newly made bomb that the US is planning on dropping on Iraq??!


One that's worthless in its military application. Haha the only bombs the US are even going THINK about bombing baghdad with are bombs that are smarter than einstein.
JohnSmith
quote:
Originally posted by JM
what imperialism? u dont see the US soldiers dropping atomic bombs over baghdad do you? or using chemicals in its bombs.

you all must think saddam is an ethical and just man

:rolleyes:

>JM<


hmm.. Actually the US is using depleted uranium weapons, which are MUCH more deadly and heinous than anything saddamn has. and as for atomic weapons the us "Hasn't ruled out their use" according to Donald Rumsefled.

saddamn, ethical and just? far from it.

but the US being imperialistic? this is all too true.

ahlamalek
BTW did you know that uranium depleted (UD) ammos are considered as WMD by the UN? hehehehe that's funny :D
occrider
quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
BTW did you know that uranium depleted (UD) ammos are considered as WMD by the UN? hehehehe that's funny :D


Really? Where did you see this? Kind of surprising if you read the WHO examination into DU that I posted.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 
Privacy Statement