 |
|
|
|
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: |
Our mutual fund is......registered with the SEC. |
I have a feeling that distinction won't exist for very long. I think the Obama administration has the public support to pass through more regulation of the hedge fund industry, mostly limiting the amount of leverage a fund could utilize (which I feel would be entirely unnecessary). I could also see regulations requiring hedge funds to cover some of their positions (ironically enough, actually "hedging" their bets). If that's the case, it will take a long time for equities to recover.
|
|
Mar-22-2009 23:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
The problem is a lot of these people simply don't understand how the markets work. It's kind of ironic that after Chris Cox implemented the short-sale ban the 2nd time last September he was later quoted in the Washington Post as saying that his biggest regret/mistake as chairman of the SEC was banning short-sales. The shorts get way too much blame in this whole fiasco. Funny how the SEC is slow to point the finger at the actual companies that invested in piles of shit. The shorts are certainly less to blame than those who allowed the derivatives market to balloon to $90T or however much it is, and who can use a notional amount of money--say $25M--to cause wild movements in the prices of common equity. Shorts are faaar outnumbered in the market by plain vanilla longs. |
agreed
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
on the leverage issue--it's certainly going to be a problem for a lot of people, but I support some sort of action that will limit the amount of debt that an entity can take on. Our hedge fund uses a maximum of 2:1 leverage while our mutual fund uses no leverage at all (in fact, through a large part of 2008 we were probably about 35-40% in cash, as crappy as cash is). |
I don't support a legal limit on leverage for private firms (that's the responsibility of the lender and the CFO), but I would support tighter thin cap limitations (for tax purposes).
|
|
Mar-23-2009 01:49
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
Does anyone know which ETFs have the most liquid shares for Euro and oil based funds? before doing research, i thought i would ask.
|
|
Mar-23-2009 14:58
|
|
|
 |
 |
Capitalizt
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Feb 2005
Location: USA
|
|
|
Party like it's 2009! (just make sure to skip town before the bill comes due)
|
|
Mar-23-2009 19:19
|
|
|
 |
 |
jerZ07002
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2006
Location:
|
|
|
| quote: | Originally posted by Shakka
FXE for the Euro. I'm sure it's not the most liquid, but it is plenty liquid.
On oil, did you want to distinguish between U.S. plays vs. int'l plays? XLE is the whole energy complex. USO is a name that some have recommended on this topic in the past, but I have read recently that the fund has grown so large that they are unable to roll over their futures and the fund is woefully underperforming--I wouldn't go after that one. |
thanks.
I don't want any international plays. I just want a fund I can sell at any time and also that moves as closely as possible with the underlying commodity.
|
|
Mar-23-2009 22:23
|
|
|
 |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:43.
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact Us - return to tranceaddict
Powered by: Trance Music & vBulletin Forums
Copyright ©2000-2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Privacy Statement / DMCA
|