|
| quote: | Originally posted by Cobalt
Even though worse vocals followed those songs, they were still pretty bad. The last three, in particular, strike me as key points where shit vocal trance finally gained acceptance in the trance mainstream. (Not surprisingly, Armin championed them.) |
Yeah I mean they aren't the best but I liked them and I thought they worked really well at the time. I mean there is worse out there like Ian van Dahl, Lasgo, DJ Sammy, Groove Coverage and the like. Now those were bad. But these were quite popular tracks at the time (2002). Pop? yes, trance? I don't know if you would exactly consider them "trance" but as pop-dance tracks, they are decent. Dance tracks vocals don't have to be Sarah McLachlan caliber good (though the remixes of her tracks are great), just some like the Lasgo crap....that's another story. Most of the vocalists on these tracks are quite popular and have been used many times with many popular tracks (Justine Suissa, Carrie Skipper, Kirsty Hawkshaw etc). They are right up there with Jan Johnston as far as mainstream trance-dance-pop music comes.
And again, none of them are Sarah McLachlan good, but like I said, dance music doesn't need Sarah Mclachlanesque vocals, just a little more musical than Lasgo's and Groove Coverage's horrible vocals (which are among the worst), which these singers are (more musically competent). Another track which I really don't consider trance at all, it's just a dance-pop track, is Andain's "Beautiful Things". I mean basically, what you might be hinting at and other people, is that they prefer vocals that are either 1. more subtle or 2. less pop-like/sing-songey. Which is fine, but some tracks are just...pop with a trance/dance feel, so they are going to naturally have a more sing-songey sound. A little more true vocal trance is so hard to find. If you want less pop-like stuff, then there are progressive house tracks with vocals, like say Terry Grant's "I'll Kill You".
Last edited by Spirit5 on Mar-25-2007 at 04:23
|