Iran War = Inevitable

US getting fucked up again = Inevitable (unless they use nuclear bombs to blow everything up)

___________________
___________________

quote:

Originally posted by Q5echo OMG you people's imaginations just don't stop do they? we're not invading Iran. we might, maybe try and knock out their clandestine nuke facilities WITH A UN MANDATE! but we're not invading Iran. Bush will not try to stay in office. Bush will not try to stay in office. how does that make any sense to any rational person who know how this political environment works at this moment! jeez.

NeoCons really should be saying that. IRAQ + WMDs = LOL

___________________
"The Greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge." -Stephen Hawking
"First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out— because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me— and there was no one left to speak out for me." -Martin Niemöller

quote:

Originally posted by Cyrus King 6)Israel is a power-hungry terrorist death machine

you mean it's like a machine that kills terrorists?


...
and on the serious note...
this is the kind of statements that drive away any will i have left to come here and debate seriously.

___________________

Best Album Ever:
* Infected Mushroom - B.P.Empire

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z NeoCons really should be saying that. IRAQ + WMDs = LOL

what?

quote:

Originally posted by shaolin_Z Well, my personal opinion is there's probably going to be another staged terrorist attack, worse than 9-11, and everyone will be all paranoid and let the Bush administration do whatever the hell they want. I'm guessing it'll be thermonuclear or biological in nature. And he'll blame it on Iran, and enough people will buy it as their congnatie abilities will be compromised shortly after the attack. Just a guess. Let's see if it actually happens.

I agree. If there is another attack on America then things will change dramatically. The next attack will probably be executed more subtly and may be more damaging than 09/11. Bush will take advantage of the situation and take harsh measures which will include some sort of confrontation with Iran. His popularity will soar again and the republicans will probably keep the power. But if such an attack does not occur, then I don't see a war with Iran in the near future based on the current political situation.

___________________

Download and review ! Omega_M - In the Mix (Beta Version)

Originally posted by twilightki : It feels like something you'd listen to at 4 in the morning, or listen to in your car while you're going in a tunnel.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M I agree. If there is another attack on America then things will change dramatically. The next attack will probably be executed more subtly and may be more damaging than 09/11. Bush will take advantage of the situation and take harsh measures which will include some sort of confrontation with Iran. His popularity will soar again and the republicans will probably keep the power. But if such an attack does not occur, then I don't see a war with Iran in the near future based on the current political situation.

What kind of weed are you smoking these days? You have a vivid imagination. Bush is not going to invade Iran as he already has enough to deal with in Iraq. JonSun is right when he points to Iran's solidarity compared to Iraq's pre-invasion. The only way Bush's military advisers would tell him invading Iran would be feasible is if we had no enormous commitments already existing. I don't see us abandoning Iraq for a worse situation. And don't worry about Bush regaining any sort of post 9/11 popularity. If another major attack does take place the American public might just blame it directly on Bush's posturing and warmongering and further inhibit his actions just as we have already begun to.

quote:

Originally posted by Nautilus What kind of weed are you smoking these days? You have a vivid imagination. Bush is not going to invade Iran as he already has enough to deal with in Iraq. JonSun is right when he points to Iran's solidarity compared to Iraq's pre-invasion. The only way Bush's military advisers would tell him invading Iran would be feasible is if we had no enormous commitments already existing. I don't see us abandoning Iraq for a worse situation. And don't worry about Bush regaining any sort of post 9/11 popularity. If another major attack does take place the American public might just blame it directly on Bush's posturing and warmongering and further inhibit his actions just as we have already begun to.

I am not smoking any weed. If you read my earlier posts in this thread I've already stated my opinion that Bush will not invade Iran under the current political scenario. Your interpretation of a 9/11 type of attack scenario is equally imaginative. Under a terrorist attack, people are likely to go in a panic mode. The only authority that can protect them is the Govt and not the opposition. Instead of playing the blame game, people are more likely to listen to the Government. And the Govt will capitalize on the situation considering the elections. It may take steps to "prove" Iran's guilt and initiate military action.

By the look of it, Bush is already beefing up the military in that region. Already the American forces are conducing cross border raids with Iran. An increase in hostilities is hardly a logistical nightmare. Yes it will increase the mess. But Bush may again "rethink" his strategy in Iraq and redeploy some the troops in Iran. This scenario is unlikely if nothing untoward happens in the US. But it may very well happen, if America comes under another terror attack.

___________________

Download and review ! Omega_M - In the Mix (Beta Version)

Originally posted by twilightki : It feels like something you'd listen to at 4 in the morning, or listen to in your car while you're going in a tunnel.

quote:

Originally posted by Omega_M I am not smoking any weed. If you read my earlier posts in this thread I've already stated my opinion that Bush will not invade Iran under the current political scenario. Your interpretation of a 9/11 type of attack scenario is equally imaginative. Under a terrorist attack, people are likely to go in a panic mode. The only authority that can protect them is the Govt and not the opposition. Instead of playing the blame game, people are more likely to listen to the Government. And the Govt will capitalize on the situation considering the elections. It may take steps to "prove" Iran's guilt and initiate military action. By the look of it, Bush is already beefing up the military in that region. Already the American forces are conducing cross border raids with Iran. An increase in hostilities is hardly a logistical nightmare. Yes it will increase the mess. But Bush may again "rethink" his strategy in Iraq and redeploy some the troops in Iran. This scenario is unlikely if nothing untoward happens in the US. But it may very well happen, if America comes under another terror attack.

I don't know. Our reaction to another attack can go either way. There's a lot of fed up people in the States. (I don't know where you're from, so I don't know if you realize this). Anyways, at this point I can only see one positive from a US invasion of Iran: I'm past conscription age . I'm not going to die for Bush's ego.

The US does not have the capacity to invade any country at this point.

The forces are stretched too thin already.

The administration may want to invade Iran, but it won't happen.



MrS

___________________
Click the sig to see MrSquirrel

-"Reality" is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes.

This is too funny. Iranians stand no chance to an armed force of 100 000 marines and the american air force and navy. You know what I say? Bring it on!

I don't think the US would invade per se, but they will likely launch air strikes and cruise missiles.

I think Mr Squirrel is right. The US doesn;t have enough troops to do the job properly on the ground, nevermind risking further chaos in Iraq if he re-deploys troops for a ground invasion of Iran.

I think the most troops that will be on the ground in Iran are special forces.

quote:

Originally posted by DevilDogUSMC 5)Ahmadinejad is mentally retarded and believes it's armageddon.

and god told Bush to invade Iraq,so who is fuckin mentally retarded?

quote:

6)Iran is a power-hungry terrorist death machine

WHEN was the last time Iran attacked or invaded another country you poor Mexican refugee?

___________________
Mystic Mind - DJ Mixes
http://soundcloud.com/mystic-mind

Facebook page
https://www.facebook.com/DJMysticMind