He defends war criminals. The difference between him, you and me is that you two need a reason to justify the belief that these same individuals have been honest with the people.
I clearly do not support the real terrorists and their version of what is the truth. Why anyone should is beyond me.
Apr-27-2009 22:32
yukii
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2008
Location:
Apr-27-2009 22:33
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Is that what you tell the judge? Cheney is guilty of treason because when you google Cheney+treason, it has a lot of results. Seriously man...
No it's what an overwhelming amount of people around the world believe they should be tried for.
Just another battle in where you are in the minority and cannot think outside the box for a moment.
Apr-27-2009 22:34
yukii
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Dec 2008
Location:
*face palm* we're going in circles here.
Neither him or I defend war criminals.
Blah, blah, treason, blah, treason.
Let's put treason down for a while here.
Cheney's honestly/dishonestly/past- has no relevance on the 9/11 cons. theory.
Apr-27-2009 22:39
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
He defends war criminals. The difference between him, you and me is that you two need a reason to justify the belief that these same individuals have been honest with the people.
I clearly do not support the real terrorists and their version of what is the truth. Why anyone should is beyond me.
lol, wtf are you talking about? I'm asking you to substantiate your accusations of treason. You call that defending war criminals. What a joke...
Apr-27-2009 22:40
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
No it's what an overwhelming amount of people around the world believe they should be tried for.
Just another battle in where you are in the minority and cannot think outside the box for a moment.
Argumentum Ad Populum
An argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people"), in logic, is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges that "If many believe so, it is so."
Apr-27-2009 22:41
pkcRAISTLIN
arbiter's chief minion
Registered: Jul 2002
Location:
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
LOL, you figure it out. I believe you can read.
10 characteristics of conspiracy theorists
A useful guide by Donna Ferentes
3. Inability to answer questions. For people who loudly advertise their determination to the principle of questioning everything, they're pretty poor at answering direct questions from sceptics about the claims that they make.
___________________
Apr-27-2009 23:06
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Cheney's honestly/dishonestly/past- has no relevance on the 9/11 cons.
No relevance? Do you have a fever or something? Cheney made decisions before, during and after 9/11 that cost thousands of innocent deaths.
The very fact that he was running a military complex simultaneously that benefited in the billions of dollars because of their "war on terror" is enough to raise a few eyebrows.
It has everything to do with 9/11.
Apr-28-2009 14:52
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by pkcRAISTLIN 10 characteristics of ignorant sheep
A useful guide by culorut
3. Inability to use common sense. For people who loudly advertise the "official conspiracy story(s)" while questioning nothing, they're pretty pathetic at admitting their own ignorance when the facts are laid in front of their eyes and proven wrong.
Apr-28-2009 14:58
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton
Argumentum Ad Populum
An argumentum ad populum (Latin: "appeal to the people"), in logic, is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or all people believe it; it alleges that "If many believe so, it is so."
Are you trying to justify that they should not be tried for war crimes then or are you just arguing for the sake of it?
Must be the ignorance and denial coming on strong again.
Apr-28-2009 15:03
culorut
Supreme tranceaddict
Registered: Jan 2007
Location: right here
quote:
Originally posted by Krypton By the way, I'm all for an independent 911 commission.
Just curious, why would that be? Lost a little faith in the the real criminals have we?
Apr-28-2009 15:05
Krypton
83.798 g/6.022x10^23
Registered: Nov 2003
Location: Texas
quote:
Originally posted by culorut
Are you trying to justify that they should not be tried for war crimes then or are you just arguing for the sake of it?
Must be the ignorance and denial coming on strong again.
No, just pointing out how fucking stupid this statement is...
quote:
By Culorot
"No it's what an overwhelming amount of people around the world believe they should be tried for.
Just another battle in where you are in the minority and cannot think outside the box for a moment."
