return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 
California and elections (pg. 4)
View this Thread in Original format
DrummeRaver86
quote:
Originally posted by festayre
I'm sad to see a great country like United States who have a President that is not elected by people but by Governors elected by people.


Ummm....the President is elected by the people, not by Governors.:)
rizen
quote:
Originally posted by DrummeRaver86
Ummm....the President is elected by the people, not by Governors.:)
the people in each state vote for electors in the electoral college, the electoral college votes for the president.
DrummeRaver86
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
the people in each state vote for electors in the electoral college, the electoral college votes for the president.


Yes, true. It's not like in many countries where you just vote for the President. So many things influence the election, it's rather ridiculous.
LiquidX
Make it Popular Vote.. that easy, and if too close a call, make a re-vote. Everycountry doesnt, why wouldnt the US be able tooo?!?! anyways.. this topic is done, hehehe

and like I said, sucks to be on Californias shoes right now
.:(
fuct4less
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
the people in each state vote for electors in the electoral college, the electoral college votes for the president.


which isnt a true democracy in my opinion
Izzy
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
um excuse me, but carter's economic stimulus appropriations act passed, Unemployment declined, but massive cost-of-living increases stimulated by huge oil price hikes in the Middle East soon dominated the Administration's domestic agenda.
    some carter/commie stuff
  • Carter built a global coalition in protesting the 1979 invasion.
  • In 1980, the U.S. suspended all high-technology and grain sales to the Soviet Union.
  • Carter not only denounced the trials of Soviet dissidents, but also spoke out for the rights of Eastern Europeans.
carter's domestic resume may not be the best, but it wasnt bad. plus he got a nobel peace award :)

good points. i completely agree that carter also helped bring the end of the cold war, thats not to say Reagan's is any less important. i just disagree with you about the economic policies of both presidents, i feel reagon had a better hold on it then carter, but its late and im too tired to back it up, sorry :p
DaveSaenz
quote:
Originally posted by festayre
I'm sad to see a great country like United States who have a President that is not elected by people but by Governors elected by people.
In France, we vote directly to elect our President. Only Senate is elected indirectly by Mayors and local councillors.
I don't understand why you don't want to change this process...



To amend the US constitution requires a 2/3rds majority in Congress.

All the small ty states (no offense to anyone) think the electoral college gives them more clout (power), so they always vote against changing to direct election. There have been many attempts to change the system. ;) Personally I also favor direct elections for president, and feel it is more representative of what the people want...:rolleyes: :whip:
rizen
quote:
Originally posted by Izzy
i just disagree with you about the economic policies of both presidents, i feel reagon had a better hold on it then carter, but its late and im too tired to back it up, sorry :p
googled :D http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm
festayre
quote:
Originally posted by DaveSaenz
To amend the US constitution requires a 2/3rds majority in Congress.

All the small ty states (no offense to anyone) think the electoral college gives them more clout (power), so they always vote against changing to direct election. There have been many attempts to change the system. ;) Personally I also favor direct elections for president, and feel it is more representative of what the people want...:rolleyes: :whip:


I'm agree but it's more power to less people states (1 vote to 150 000 people = 1 vote to 18 000 000 people).
In France : 1 vote = 1 person.
In number of people's votes, G.W.Bush don't have the major part. But the college vote gives to him the victory...
St_Andrew
quote:
Originally posted by DaveSaenz
To amend the US constitution requires a 2/3rds majority in Congress.

All the small ty states (no offense to anyone) think the electoral college gives them more clout (power), so they always vote against changing to direct election. There have been many attempts to change the system. ;) Personally I also favor direct elections for president, and feel it is more representative of what the people want...:rolleyes: :whip:


Actually the EU is even more sick, in
the Council of Ministers (EU's supreme decicision-making body) every country has one vote, even if the country is Luxenburg or Germany... I live in sweden so for us this is a good system, but REALLY sick....

festayre
Yes but the President of Union Européenne doesn't exists yet. In the commission européenne, the "Commissaires" are designed by members countries. The more big the country is, the more they can design commissaire from their country. For example : France : 2 Commissaires Européens, Luxembourg : 1 Commissaire Européen.

And the Presidence of the Europe turns every six months. Since July 1st, Italy is the country that leads European Union.
Izzy
quote:
Originally posted by rizen
googled :D http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/L-carterreagan.htm


back at you ;)

http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa-261.html


"...and Reagan comes out an top"
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 
Privacy Statement