|
Female Rating System
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Orbax |
My friends came up with this, and now we all use it, and I think it should be more widely accepted than the common 1-10 scale
so the first rating is a BODY rating. from -10 (EXTREMELY ANOREXIC, like concentration camp thin (dont get offended dicks)) to 10 which is horrific obesity. now a 0 is a perfect body. -5 is your average "shes just too thin". so a -2 is still really good, shes just a smidge on the skinny side, with a +2 being smidge on the rounder side. but basically anything in the -2 - 2 range is really good stuff.
the second rating is the FACE scale of how cute they are. (standard 1-10)
so you end up with a rating of a -2 X 8 (pretty damn hot)
the second one is something I am still working on, its mainly an interactive scale based on a golf model.
the rating is a put-put to a par 5, with par 5 being the most difficult.
now lets say you are at a club. a -3X7 girl is sitting there. you assign her a value of approximately a par 3. a man 4x7 comes up. hes also a par 3. the approacher is the one making the shot, so he is shooting for par.
NOW, lets say the man is the same, but the woman is a -1x9, a model. she is placed at a par 5. there is no way he is only 2 levels below her. so he gets kicked back to a par 2. He is now shooting a triple bogey on her.
this interactive scale, is basically a wholesome way to make fun of people, and it doesnt neccessarily imply success or failure, merely the attempt. Put-puts are advised to take Mulligans on par 4+'s.
it could also work though, you try to meet some girl, just come back to the table and cheers to Mulligans ;)
those are my two systems I hope they help you in future endeavors |
|
|
| Dumbum |
| you go around carrying scientific calculators in clubs? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Orbax |
| quote: | Originally posted by Dumbum
you go around carrying scientific calculators in clubs? :rolleyes: :rolleyes: |
HAHAH thats mint! wait...no it isnt. sorry. |
|
|
| Dumbum |
| pick up artists have gone through several rating methods, some similar to your attempt, and in the end they sticked to the 1-10 scale. sooo..ur method sucks :) mint now? |
|
|
| fuct4less |
| i lost you on the golf part |
|
|
| Essential1 |
I still think the paper-bag scale is the best:
0 - no bag required.
1 - clear bag on her face
2 - paper bag with eye & mouth holes
3 - paper bag with just a mouth hole
4 - full paper bag
5 - body bag tied very tightly |
|
|
| ThaDevil |
| Orbax you have issues buddy :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Essential1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by ThaDevil
Orbax you have issues buddy :rolleyes: |
no he doesn't, he just makes meeting women more fun. |
|
|
| UWM |
Orbax man you ing crack me up, especially this one
| quote: | Originally posted by Orbax
I found that a good way to stop people from bothering you is to drink alcohol. And then get angry or something. I forgot exactly what I do
|
:stongue: |
|
|
| igottaknow |
Dude u got way too much time on ur hand. btw I use a modified 1-10 scale, i know it aint too scientific but it works...
1 = :eek:
2 = :nervous:
3 = :clown:
4 = :thepirate
5 = :o
6 = :)
7 = ;)
8 = :D
9 = :eyes:
10= :crazy: |
|
|
| infiniteparadox |
| quote: | Originally posted by UWM
Orbax man you ing crack me up, especially this one
|
Lol I have to agree, that gave me a good laugh. |
|
|
|
|
