|
Ecstasy (pg. 2)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| Alccode |
^^ I've tried it once, and the effects are quite distinct and easily describable, I mean, you'll know why it's called "ecstacy."
Think of a time when you were really elated, if even for just a second or two... like when you hear an awesome track, or you get really happy for a few seconds during the day when you remember you have to meet someone you like etc., whatever. You feel a rush in your heart, and so on. It's exactly that feeling but prolonged. So you're on it all the time. Also you talk alot, feel peaceful with the world, etc. etc., you've probably heard it all before.
Try to get as pure a sample (of MDMA) as possible; with every high there's a low and the one time I tried it, I was in the low for an entire week. Supposedly this was due to the pollutants in the pill I had, but I believe that in addition to that, it was simply a natural balance... what goes up must come down. And if you go REALLY up (which you do on E), you have to fall REALLY low. Also it depends on your psychological/emotional makeup, I guess.
You might also suddenly get very depressed while still high, because you'll realize that you're so f'ing happy and that it will be over in a few hours. That one thought can be quite agonizing.
All in all an interesting experience, if you can handle the great joy and sadness afterwards. I don't think you'll get addicted from one try, and the physical consequences aren't all that bad (if they exist at all), if you just do it once, or occasionally. There are short-term psychological consequences, however, but that's just what I've noticed, your mileage may definitely vary. |
|
|
| auscosmo |
| give me E, well not really |
|
|
| rupert |
Provided you come at it with an open mind, your pills are good quality and the setting is good, you will have a great time.
Ecstacy isnt a drug that creates dependancy, although if you like your first experience you will want to do it again.
Your first few times are the best experiences so make sure you make the most of it, ie go out and do something, dont just sit at home.
If you can get it take E's with LSD, although I would probably learn to crawl before I can walk.
As for the legalisation issue, the drug laws are just a pathetic form of social control, the War on Drugs is just another one of the wonderful gifts america has given the world. |
|
|
| Alccode |
| quote: | Originally posted by rupert
As for the legalisation issue, the drug laws are just a pathetic form of social control, the War on Drugs is just another one of the wonderful gifts america has given the world. |
Wisely said. |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by rupert
As for the legalisation issue, the drug laws are just a pathetic form of social control, the War on Drugs is just another one of the wonderful gifts america has given the world. |
The first US drug law was passed in 1875 and was a San Francisco city ordinace against opium. National drug laws weren't passed until 1937. If you want to look at the use of drug laws as a form of social control and who influenced whom why don't you look back a bit further. K thnx. :rolleyes: |
|
|
| MisterOpus1 |
I tried ecstacy a couple of times, but then I wised up......
I realized that the creation of this particular drug was likely the result of madmen control freaks. From this simple conclusion I deduced it might have been the following characters:
1. Zionists
2. Christian Fundamentalists
3. Neo-cons
4. GOP
5. Pat Robertson
6. Clinton
7. Dean
8. Bush empire
I'm inclined to believe ATM that #8 and #3 are the culprits, but #5 is comin' in strong as well.
And, of course, you could never count out #6 - it's always his fault for everything.
But some of these also intertwine a bit, which leaves deductive principles a little murky. My research is not finished, but I assure you I will have earth-shattering results in my conclusions.
To be continued...... |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I tried ecstacy a couple of times, but then I wised up......
I realized that the creation of this particular drug was likely the result of madmen control freaks. From this simple conclusion I deduced it might have been the following characters:
1. Zionists
2. Christian Fundamentalists
3. Neo-cons
4. GOP
5. Pat Robertson
6. Clinton
7. Dean
8. Bush empire
I'm inclined to believe ATM that #8 and #3 are the culprits, but #5 is comin' in strong as well.
And, of course, you could never count out #6 - it's always his fault for everything.
But some of these also intertwine a bit, which leaves deductive principles a little murky. My research is not finished, but I assure you I will have earth-shattering results in my conclusions.
To be continued...... |
Couldn't you just save yourself the trouble of research and pin it on the vast right wing conspiracy? Or God? |
|
|
| ezbeats |
| quote: | | I would think that legalization would make E cheaper. If not, at least I would be able to make it myself, so I'm all for it |
i have to disagree, strongly. this is why cigarets and alcohol are as expensive as they are, they are taxed. if the gov't legalized any additional drugs they would tax the hell out of them so people couldn't spend 5$ and overdose. they would make us spend 100$ to overdose. :D
i mean im sure the gov't knows the average price across the nation for a 8th of good weed is about 50$ (usd). so if it wer legalized, they would use this knowledge and tax the proper amount in their views, cause they know pot smokers WILL pay 50$ an 8th. i dunno, god i wish it were legal, and i could just buy a pack of joints. all prerolled, nice filter tip or something to the roach doesnt unravel and you could smoke it to the end, no roach clips, good tasting, oyyyyyy. ima go smoke, later- |
|
|
| NeoPhono |
| quote: | Originally posted by ezbeats
i mean im sure the gov't knows the average price across the nation for a 8th of good weed is about 50$ (usd). |
Damn boy, you get a BJ with that? That's a lotta money for an 8th. |
|
|
| MisterOpus1 |
| quote: | Originally posted by occrider
Couldn't you just save yourself the trouble of research and pin it on the vast right wing conspiracy? Or God? |
I'm trying to be specific damnit! But while we're on the subjects of Right Wingers, Dick, I most certainly left one out:
1. Zionists
2. Christian Fundamentalists
3. Neo-cons
4. GOP
5. Pat Robertson
6. Clinton
7. Dean
8. Bush empire
9. Dick Cheney and Halliburton
More research. Much more research needed now....... |
|
|
| occrider |
| quote: | Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I'm trying to be specific damnit! But while we're on the subjects of Right Wingers, Dick, I most certainly left one out:
1. Zionists
2. Christian Fundamentalists
3. Neo-cons
4. GOP
5. Pat Robertson
6. Clinton
7. Dean
8. Bush empire
9. Dick Cheney and Halliburton
More research. Much more research needed now....... |
Uh oh ... getting close
QUICK EVERYBODY CHECK THIS OUT!
http://orbita.starmedia.com/xiscoun...ri/pagina02.htm (NSFW) |
|
|
|
|
