return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 
European officials: "we are anti-semetic"
View this Thread in Original format
dj_ilan_yosef
This week I took part in a conference on anti-Semitism in Europe. Hosted by the president of the European Commission Romano Prodi, the conference brought together leaders from around the world determined to fight the new wave of anti-Semitism that has engulfed Europe over the last few years.
The question is how the sincere intentions of the participants to combat this evil can be translated into effective action.

My experience has convinced me that moral clarity is critical in taking a stand against evil. Evil cannot be defeated if it cannot be recognized, and the only way to recognize evil is to draw clear moral lines. Evil thrives when those lines are blurred, when right and wrong is a matter of opinion rather than objective truth.

That is what makes the battle against the so-called new anti-Semitism so difficult.
To the free world's modern eyes, classical anti-Semitism is easily discernible. If we watch films that show Jews draining the blood of Gentile children or plotting to take over the world, most of us would immediately recognize it as anti-Semitism.

Such movies, produced recently by the government-controlled media in Egypt and Syria and broadcast via satellite to hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world, including millions of Muslim immigrants in Western Europe, employ motifs and canards that are familiar to us.

But the new anti-Semitism is far more subtle. Whereas classical anti-Semitism was seen as being aimed at the Jewish religion or the Jewish people, the new anti-Semitism is ostensibly directed against the Jewish state. Since this anti-Semitism can hide behind the veneer of legitimate criticism of Israel, it is much more difficult to expose.

In fact, over the past year, whenever we have criticized particularly virulent anti-Israel statements as being rooted in anti-Semitism, the response has invariably been that we are trying to stifle legitimate criticism of Israel by deliberately labeling it anti-Semitism.

What emerged from this conference was an admission by European leaders themselves that not all criticism of Israel is legitimate. This recognition was evident in the remarks of President Romano Prodi, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer and other officials.

If not all criticism is valid, how then do we define the boundary line?

I propose the following test for differentiating legitimate criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism. The 3D test, as I call it, is not a new one. It merely applies to the new anti-Semitism the same criteria that for centuries identified the different dimensions of classical anti-Semitism.


The first D is the test of demonization.
Whether it came in the theological form of a collective accusation of deicide or in the literary depiction of Shakespeare's Shylock, Jews were demonized for centuries as the embodiment of evil. Therefore, today we must be wary of whether the Jewish state is being demonized by having its actions blown out of all sensible proportion.
For example, the comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to Auschwitz ? comparisons heard practically every day within the "enlightened" quarters of Europe ? can only be considered anti-Semitic.
Those who draw such analogies either do not know anything about Nazi Germany or, more plausibly, are deliberately trying to paint modern-day Israel as the embodiment of evil.


The second D is the test of double standards. For thousands of years a clear sign of anti-Semitism was treating Jews differently than other peoples, from the discriminatory laws many nations enacted against them to the tendency to judge their behavior by a different yardstick.
Similarly, today we must ask whether criticism of Israel is being applied selectively. In other words, do similar policies by other governments engender the same criticism, or is there a double standard at work?

It is anti-Semitism, for instance, when Israel is singled out by the United Nations for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria are ignored.

Likewise, it is anti-Semitism when Israel's Magen David Adom, alone among the world's ambulance services, is denied admission to the International Red Cross.


The third D is the test of deligitimation. In the past, anti-Semites tried to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish religion, the Jewish people, or both. Today, they are trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state, presenting it, among other things, as the last vestige of colonialism.
While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland.

To remember the 3D test I suggest we recall those 3D movies we enjoyed as children. Without those special glasses the movie was flat and blurred. But when we put on our glasses the screen came alive, and we saw everything with perfect clarity.

In the same way, if we do not wear the right glasses, the line between legitimate criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism will be blurred and we will not be able to recognize this ancient evil, much less fight it.

But if we wear the special glasses provided by the 3D test ? if we check whether Israel is being demonized or deligitimized, or whether a double standard is being applied to it ? we will always be able to see anti-Semitism clearly.

And with moral clarity, I have no doubt that our efforts to combat this evil will prove far more effective.

The writer is Israel's Minister of Diaspora Affairs and Jerusalem.
Natan Sharansky
George Smiley
Mate, you just dont like Europeans do you?!

I feel quite insulted the way Israelis continue to label Europeans as anti-semitic due to what the Nazis did in WW2. No, Europe is not being engulfed in anti-semitism at all. You see criticism of Israel mixed with infrequent reports of anti-semitism from European Muslims and come to the conclusion that we are all Hitler wannabes. Everyday I hear racism directed at Muslims/Asians. Not once in my life have I ever heard any mention of anything even remotely anti-semitic. Never.

The term anti-semitism is becoming meaningless and hollow the more people like you keep throwing it around willy nilly at the slightest criticism of Israel (Ariel Sharon himself has defined criticism of Israel as anti-semitic and you seem to be towing the line). So well done, give yourelf a pat on the back, you have sucessfully nullified the very term you are trying to combat.

Dont get me wrong, I'm sure there are a great deal of anti-semites in Europe, but I think the vast majority of them are confined to the Muslim community, and I am sure there are just as many anti-semites in America too (ever heard of the KKK???)
St_Andrew
quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
Mate, you just dont like Europeans do you?!

I feel quite insulted the way Israelis continue to label Europeans as anti-semitic due to what the Nazis did in WW2. No, Europe is not being engulfed in anti-semitism at all. You see criticism of Israel mixed with infrequent reports of anti-semitism from European Muslims and come to the conclusion that we are all Hitler wannabes. Everyday I hear racism directed at Muslims/Asians. Not once in my life have I ever heard any mention of anything even remotely anti-semitic. Never.

The term anti-semitism is becoming meaningless and hollow the more people like you keep throwing it around willy nilly at the slightest criticism of Israel (Ariel Sharon himself has defined criticism of Israel as anti-semitic and you seem to be towing the line). So well done, give yourelf a pat on the back, you have sucessfully nullified the very term you are trying to combat.

Dont get me wrong, I'm sure there are a great deal of anti-semites in Europe, but I think the vast majority of them are confined to the Muslim community, and I am sure there are just as many anti-semites in America too (ever heard of the KKK???)


well, put, about what i wanted to say, just that i did't want to sacrifice my powers on this guy... :p
ahlamalek
blablablabla

cricizing the state of Israel and its governement doesn't equal to anti-semitism:rolleyes:
Dmatrox
on a somewhat related note, why do they call it anti-semitism? why dont their just call it racism or prejudice.

Discrimination: Treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit

Anti-sematism: Hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism.
Discrimination against Jews.


same goddamn thing


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=antisemitism
smokeape
quote:
Originally posted by ahlamalek
blablablabla

cricizing the state of Israel and its governement doesn't equal to anti-semitism:rolleyes:


Side with Ahlamalek here. WTF is the point of the article in the original posting? Since you offer us none of your own insight, then I would suggest you are nothing more than a f*cking instigator provoking the rest of us!

:whip:
[[[smoke]]]
dj_ilan_yosef
quote:
Originally posted by smokeape
Since you offer us none of your own insight, then I would suggest you are nothing more than a f*cking instigator provoking the rest of us!

:whip:
[[[smoke]]]


And it only took you 4 years to catch on.... the rest of them fools have yet to catch on, shhhh, you're on my team now!
George Smiley
Another thing...your title is "European Officials: We Are Anti-Semitic"...just point me to the part of the article where any European Leader states that?

And "semite" means a member of a group of peoples including Jews and Arabs...guess that means a whole load of Israelis are themselves anti-semitic...
Yoepus
quote:
Originally posted by George Smiley
And "semite" means a member of a group of peoples including Jews and Arabs...guess that means a whole load of Israelis are themselves anti-semitic...


here we go again:rolleyes:

tathi, wanna take this one?;)
anuneventrade
quote:
Originally posted by Dmatrox
on a somewhat related note, why do they call it anti-semitism? why dont their just call it racism or prejudice.

Discrimination: Treatment or consideration based on class or category rather than individual merit

Anti-sematism: Hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism.
Discrimination against Jews.


same goddamn thing


http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=antisemitism


Probably because anti-semitism is against a particular group and discrimination pertains to many different groups. Anti-semitism by definition is the prejudice of the Jewish, discrimination is against any particular group.

Dmatrox
What i don't get is why they need to be pigeon holed into a particular group. You dont see names for discrimination against blacks, hispanics, asians, etc... I just think its silly to find another term to describe discrimination against jews.
ahlamalek
quote:
Originally posted by Dmatrox
What i don't get is why they need to be pigeon holed into a particular group. You dont see names for discrimination against blacks, hispanics, asians, etc... I just think its silly to find another term to describe discrimination against jews.


because who cares about descrimination against blacks, hispanics, asians?? not that important....

Jews are the only ones that count.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 
Privacy Statement