|
dont m3d have less torque than mk2?
|
View this Thread in Original format
| mndeg |
| I read it on a website, true? |
|
|
| tranceDJ |
| I think they're the same if not slightly different...only used the mk2 so can't speak from experience. And wouldn't the m3d have more torque because it's a newer model? Overall though, any tech should have enough torque for anyone. |
|
|
| Vero |
| not at all. i have M3ds, but often spin on mk2s at friends' houses or when spinning out. i think the M3ds have more torque, but if not more then they are exactly the same. |
|
|
| tu_face |
| i thought they all had 1.5kg..? |
|
|
| Breeze |
| same different name.as long as it turns the record. |
|
|
| DJTJ |
| No. The Mk2 and the M3D use exactly the same motor. The torque is exactly the same. |
|
|
| dj chex |
| true the mk2 and m3d have identical electronics. The only electrical difference is the pitch slider. |
|
|
| subtledreamer |
| quote: | Originally posted by mndeg
I read it on a website, true? |
i have one of each (mk2 and m3d) and i gotta say they feel equally powerful |
|
|
| `pr0digy |
| Seems to me theres quite a lot of Technics rumors floating around. torque on mk2 == torque on m3d. |
|
|
| BeatSMiTH |
| Being an owner of an MK2 and an M3D, I'd say the torque difference is something that is unoticable. You'd probly need actual testing equipment to verify that. |
|
|
| dj chex |
| there's other things that can be contributing factors to feel differences between your friend's deck and yours. IE, his bearing may be a little dry and tense, also maybe a pot adjustment is slightly off. IF you were to look at the drive control pcb on a mk2 and a m3d you probably won't be able to tell the difference b/c they are the same. On the last production run of the m3d, i've noticed they changed it slightly for use w/ newer mk5 and mk5g by having a connector for 16% pitch. Everything else is the same though. |
|
|
|
|
