return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Other > Political Discussion / Debate

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 
Terror Alert Levels
View this Thread in Original format
xKaoSx
/ranton

I am so ing sick of all these different terror threat levels.
WHY BOTHER EVEN TELLING US?

This is rediculous- Arn't the terror threat "levels" just admitting
we dont know what the is going on?

All it does it the same thing is when you god damn car alarm goes off? Who really pays attention the them anyways? So why tell us.

All this talk of a "large scale attack" before elections and they dont raise the "threat level".

Terrorist and Terror Level Threats.

/rantoff
Q5echo
remember several months ago at the outset of the 9/11 commission when everyone was pissing and moaning about how the administration didn't disclose enough information in the first 8 months prior to 9/11?

they couldn't do enough then for the critics in the wee stages of taking office. why should the critics be any less indifferent now?

it's also been said that the timing is suspect during the week of kerry's VP pick. to me thats horse along the same lines as the criticism but oh well, what are ya gonna do? the whole f**kin world is a conspiracy, right?
Arbiter
The government that cried wolf?

You bet.
xKaoSx
quote:
Originally posted by Q5echo
remember several months ago at the outset of the 9/11 commission when everyone was pissing and moaning about how the administration didn't disclose enough information in the first 8 months prior to 9/11?

they couldn't do enough then for the critics in the wee stages of taking office. why should the critics be any less indifferent now?

it's also been said that the timing is suspect during the week of kerry's VP pick. to me thats horse along the same lines as the criticism but oh well, what are ya gonna do? the whole f**kin world is a conspiracy, right?


The point is informing all the major agencies- not making it a lead story on the ing news everynight.
GODLESSCOMMIE
their trying to instil fear and hatered amongst the populous. Their not trying to cover their asses around holidays their goal is to remind us of the threat the terriosts supposedly are. Also so we dont forget about dem der towel heads takin a likin to killin us. I can't think of anyother logical reason for their behavior.
auujay
It is all just FUD, don't be fooled.
MisterOpus1
I think the public is finally catching on to Bush/Ridge/Ashcroft's bull:

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/resul...46.exclude.html

93% feel the terrorist warnings are a part of just playing politics.

Pathetic.
anuneventrade
quote:
Originally posted by GODLESSCOMMIE
their trying to instil fear and hatered amongst the populous. Their not trying to cover their asses around holidays their goal is to remind us of the threat the terriosts supposedly are. Also so we dont forget about dem der towel heads takin a likin to killin us. I can't think of anyother logical reason for their behavior.


Do you ever speak clearly? Is it difficult to use what you learned in Elementary school and spell correctly? See.. this sentence, for example: "I can't think of anyother logical reason for their behavior." Now, you could be taking about two seperate groups of people. You could be referring to "dem der towel heads", or you could be referring to the Bush Administration. Ugh.

quote:
Originally posted by MisterOpus1
I think the public is finally catching on to Bush/Ridge/Ashcroft's bull:

http://www.cnn.com/POLLSERVER/resul...46.exclude.html

93% feel the terrorist warnings are a part of just playing politics.

Pathetic.


Only took them three years to figure it out. Maybe the public deserves some sort of metal?
LiquidX
quote:
Originally posted by anuneventrade




Only took them three years to figure it out. Maybe the public deserves some sort of metal?


Definetly..
MisterOpus1
quote:
Ellis Henican
Electing to deal with terror threat

July 9, 2004


He couldn't say where.

He couldn't say when.

He couldn't say who.

He couldn't say how.

So why did Tom Ridge even bother coming out before the microphones and cameras yesterday, stirring up public anxiety about a pre-election terror attack?

It wasn't as if the Bush administration's homeland security secretary had any useful information to share. All he had was another eerie-sounding warning and the same ol' advice we've been getting since the morning of Sept. 12, 2001:

Stay vigilant.

Report anything scary you might see.

Well, OK.

"Credible reporting now indicates that al-Qaida is moving forward with its plans to carry out a large-scale attack in the United States in an effort to disrupt our democratic process," Ridge warned darkly.

But how credible is Ridge's supposed evidence of a pre-election attack? Will the bad guys hit one of the political conventions this summer? Or will they wait until November and strike close to Election Day?

I have no idea. And neither, I promise you, does Tom Ridge. Or John Ashcroft, Or Dick Cheney. Or any of the other Bush administration officials who are shooting these vague warnings around.

If a terror attack were as certain and as imminent as Ridge is making out, wouldn't he raise the color-coded terror threat immediately?

He's leaving it at yellow, right where it is.

And when he was asked straight out yesterday, Ridge could only shrug.

"Mr. Secretary, do you have any specific credible intelligence that terrorists are targeting either the Democratic Convention or the Republican Convention?"

"We do not," he had to admit.

Watch carefully now. Something cynical is happening here.

With each new pointless warning, with each new breathless plea, those around George W. Bush are trying to link the terrorists with the Democrats.

Al-Qaida wants to "influence the American election," we are told. The terrorists hope to "pull another Spain," where the ruling party was voted out after the Madrid subway was bombed.

The implication isn't accidental, and it gets real ugly real fast: A vote for John Kerry, we are supposed to conclude, is a vote for Osama bin Laden.

Now this is preposterous, of course.

Kerry's terror-fighting plans are at least as tough as Bush's. Across a long public career, he has never been soft on terrorism. And honestly, no one has a clue what Osama thinks of the U.S. election, if he thinks anything at all.

Osama doesn't endorse, whatever Karl Rove might imply.

Plus, you'd have to say that al-Qaida hasn't done too badly under George W. Bush, and not just because Bush was president during the 9/11 terror attacks.

Bin Laden is still a free man. So is bin Laden's chief deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri. And so is Mullah Mohammed Omar, the supreme Taliban leader and bin Laden's most important ally.

And the war in Iraq has turned that country into a hotbed of terrorists from across the Middle East. The war and the occupation have been a rhetorical bonanza for al-Qaida and like-minded groups.

American soldiers, controlling an oil-rich Muslim country! Killing innocent civilians, leaving embittered relatives behind! The Abu Ghraib prison-torture photos!

Can't you hear the terror recruiters now?

Leave it to New York to bring some sense to all this.

At police headquarters yesterday, Commissioner Ray Kelly came out of his office after Tom Ridge was done in Washington.

Kelly didn't pretend to know what the terrorists are planning - or who they'd vote for if they could.

He said the only thing a big-city cop can ever say at such a time: His department will be ready at the end of August when the Republican National Convention comes to town.

Then, without being impolite to anyone in Washington, the New York police commissioner scoffed at the notion that al-Qaida has a candidate for U.S. president.

"No," Kelly said plainly, "the information is not that they are trying to influence the election in a certain way."

It's just that the terrorists have been emboldened. They could strike any time. And we'd better be ready for them.

http://www.newsday.com/news/columni...news-columnists


I just can't believe that 93% have it wrong. This is a ridiculous ploy, but it really isn't far off the typical "scare tactics" this Administration willfully employs on us.

People are sick of Bush's Admin. crying "wolf".

xKaoSx
quote:
Originally posted by anuneventrade

Only took them three years to figure it out. Maybe the public deserves some sort of metal?


Oh dearest Anun- Your brilliant rant on the destruction of the english language and you end it with - "some sort of metal?"

You are forgiven though.
ONCE.
:D

I can just see the Bush campaign meetings- Yea- lets put a terror warning out- we need attention back on us.

I get physically irritated now when I even hear anything about the terror threat level- I heard it enough at the airport when I was there.

This is just rediculous and it's going to backfire in a big way.
anuneventrade
quote:
Originally posted by xKaoSx
Oh dearest Anun- Your brilliant rant on the destruction of the english language and you end it with - "some sort of metal?"

You are forgiven though.
ONCE.
:D


Aren't they called metals? I couldn't remember what you guys call those things. The round metal thing usually attached at the end of some ridiculous rope as though an individual would actually wear it around their neck... you know what I'm talking about.

Are they really not called metals? Hmm, maybe "award" would have been a more sufficient choice, but I was almost certain it was called a metal. *shrugs* Thank you for forgiving me oh great one ;)
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 
Privacy Statement