|
Question for those who use Winamp
|
View this Thread in Original format
| torontotrance |
| Winamp is used by a lot of us and I've used 2.81 for a long time now and winamp tells me everytime I load the bitch to upgrade to 5. So should I upgrade to 5 or stay 2.81, I'd be happy to hear what you think. |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| Id upgrade. Its not really that different, and it supports more. |
|
|
| Radagast |
| To me there's no recognizable difference while using the classic winamp skin. |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| I'm just tired of the lame bombardment from winamp and I'd hate to lose my current winamp skin, which is just a larger pic of my avatar |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| quote: | Originally posted by Ang ' ela_ie
Id upgrade. Its not really that different, and it supports more. |
Like a sports bra, just because it supports more doesn't necessarily make it better.
Any other differences? |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| :( Ok Im done now. |
|
|
| Fundamental |
| quote: | Originally posted by torontotrance
I'm just tired of the lame bombardment from winamp and I'd hate to lose my current winamp skin, which is just a larger pic of my avatar |
Surely newer versions would be backwardly compatible with older skins? :conf: |
|
|
| Vigilante |
I like the new version of Winamp 5.
It has all i need, and it never stuffs up for me, ever.
Hmmmm, to think i was a Windows Media Player man until six months ago! |
|
|
| Ang ' ela_ie |
| quote: | Originally posted by Vigilante
Hmmmm, to think i was a Windows Media Player man until six months ago! |
I still use WMP for some of my other nontrance playlists that I dont want to recreate. |
|
|
| Matt |
in Winamp 5 as resource friendly as 2.81?
cuz that was the big problem with 3?
Also, what about backwards compatability for plugins? |
|
|
| torontotrance |
| hmmmm...i upgraded and it kept my dido skin! |
|
|
|
|
