|
Stanton DJ-Pro 3000 & DJ-Pro 2000 headphones
|
View this Thread in Original format
| DJ_Hailstone |
Have them somebody tried?
I want to buy them,but...
A friend of mine have them, they look good, the sound is also good,
but dunno how it is about durability. I am afraid they can break like Pioneer HDJ1000 or Sony 700s.
And how it is about Stanton DJ-Pro 2000 ones? |
|
|
| Dervish |
| I've had the 2000's for 3 yrs of heavy use with no problems. |
|
|
| Tiger777 |
| I've bought them 3 weeks ago. So far so good allthough. But I do recommend you to drop a small amount of oil into the turning mechanism. That way, it works smoother. |
|
|
| Wraith |
| quote: | Originally posted by DJ_Hailstone
And how it is about Stanton DJ-Pro 2000 ones? |
I have them and love them. I've had them for about 6 months with regular use and not a problem yet. |
|
|
| Exodus17 |
i was wanting to know the same about the new 3000's,
im gonna be buying a new set of phones soon and i was wanting to get some comparison input about these 3
MDR-700
HDJ-1000
DJ Pro- 3000/2000
ive heard the sonys break easy and the ones that they had on display at best buy were coincedently broken at the swivel
i hear that the pioneers are really good as far as sound quality but i think im gonna go for the stantons b/c of the overall look/stats/and features of them
just wanting some feedback from experience...
thx |
|
|
| Tiger777 |
| Get the stanton 2000. The 3000 is a fair bit more expensive than the 2000 and as far as I've heard, it's VERY comparable. |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tiger777
Get the stanton 2000. The 3000 is a fair bit more expensive than the 2000 and as far as I've heard, it's VERY comparable. |
The 2000s are ugly as hell though. |
|
|
| Tiger777 |
| I think the 3000 is. It has these ugly blue leds sticking out of your ears...:nervous: |
|
|
| beats and beeps |
| quote: | Originally posted by Tiger777
I think the 3000 is. It has these ugly blue leds sticking out of your ears...:nervous: |
You own them though, right? Just curious on how you think their build quality is. They look like sonys but im hoping they arent built like them. |
|
|
| djlemeir |
the 2000s are rock solid.
1 yr hardcore usage... no problemo.
the 3000s look like sony knockoffs
cheap if u ask me |
|
|
| Tiger777 |
| quote: | Originally posted by beats and beeps
You own them though, right? Just curious on how you think their build quality is. They look like sonys but im hoping they arent built like them. |
I own the 2000's. I've had them for a month or something now I guess. When I used them at first, I had doubts about the build quality of the turning mechanism. It's felt kinda tough and vulnerable. But after the drop of oil, the shells turn smoothly :)
They say the 3000 are internally almost the same as the 2000's but quite a bit expensive. For now, I can say the price/quality of the 2000's is excellent.
As for the build quality of the 3000's, I haven't read one bad review about it. If it's the same mechanism as the 2000, it shouldn't be a problem...:clown: |
|
|
| Exodus17 |
yea i kinda agree the 2000s are somewhat ugly, not horribly so, but not anything special either
personally i love the way the sonys look feel and sound but the fact theyre so prone to breaking is why i havent bought em...
i figure im gonna spend a good $100 bucks on headphones and id like em to be durable, the sony v600 is a great model but i find it to be somewhat bulky when its sitting on my shoulders so thats why im shooting for a model with the swivel mechanism and round cups, as soon as ive saved up im gonna buy a pair of ST-150s and the 3000s match well with em IMO
my main concern is are the 3000s as durable as the 2000s? |
|
|
|
|
