|
Firefox aims for 10 percent of Web surfers (pg. 5)
|
View this Thread in Original format
| dEsidEL |
hey every little bit helps .. ;)
|
|
|
| Matt |
5x IE windows
Trillian/MSN/ICQ/AIM
Winamp
MS Word
Excel
it adds up. the less memory use = fewer memory leaks = faster browsing = more pr0n = more wanks per hour
I don't think anyone can argue with more wanking? |
|
|
| Crazy Serb |
| quote: | Originally posted by Matt
I don't think anyone can argue with more wanking? |
you think? :D |
|
|
| The Highroller |
| quote: | Originally posted by Matt
Tribes * > Halo |
WORD! |
|
|
| j_spot |
ok, so I have 0.9.3, but there is no icon where it told me to go from 0.9 to 0.9.3. So i clicked that blank area and it tells me there are no updates, however in my help>about tab it says im still on 0.9.3.
if thats so, how come Im not getting an update? |
|
|
| Slag |
ooh 1.0
I have to get me that sometime today. |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by dEsidEL
hey every little bit helps .. ;)
|
For what?
Are you sending your computer to MARS where every little bit counts?
I'm with RJ on this one; splitting atoms because of a few Ks in a world of Gs is pointless... :rolleyes: |
|
|
| Slag |
| quote: | Originally posted by Espresso
sorry malek but that's a silly comment.
opened 5 IE windows (all pointing to yahoo.com) total memory consumption:115,304 K
have 8 tabs opened in firefox pointing to 8 different sites with more pics, total memory :41,996 K
never thought about that, eh? ;) |
For those who think "just buy more ram"...
Those numbers aren't small. 115 megs vs 42 megs. Huge difference.
I try to keep my mem usage as low as possible (~80 megs) for a fresh bootup. I do this even though I have a gig of ram.
Also, why should I have to buy 'more' when I can use what I have more efficiently? |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
No one seems to be answering my question...
I understand there might be some technical satisfaction and bragging rights for having achieved low boot times and Mem usage but that thinking is so 10 years ago...
In this day and age, things are cheap, cheap, cheap.
Processors are way faster than any applications (minus gaming because gaming always pushes the boundries of the hardware spectrum) that are out there.
RAM is so much cheaper than it used to be and to complaining the cost of that? Just over $100 for 512Meg DDR is nothing to complain about... |
|
|
| Slag |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
No one seems to be answering my question...
I understand there might be some technical satisfaction and bragging rights for having achieved low boot times and Mem usage but that thinking is so 10 years ago...
In this day and age, things are cheap, cheap, cheap.
Processors are way faster than any applications (minus gaming because gaming always pushes the boundries of the hardware spectrum) that are out there.
RAM is so much cheaper than it used to be and to complaining the cost of that? Just over $100 for 512Meg DDR is nothing to complain about... |
Oh but I do game and thus I see quite a big difference when the system is tweaked vs not tweaked.:) |
|
|
| loconet |
| quote: | Originally posted by Fir3start3r
No one seems to be answering my question...
I understand there might be some technical satisfaction and bragging rights for having achieved low boot times and Mem usage but that thinking is so 10 years ago...
In this day and age, things are cheap, cheap, cheap.
Processors are way faster than any applications (minus gaming because gaming always pushes the boundries of the hardware spectrum) that are out there.
RAM is so much cheaper than it used to be and to complaining the cost of that? Just over $100 for 512Meg DDR is nothing to complain about... |
Yah, it's arguable I guess. The normal users now a days, with a fast enough computer wouldn't notice the difference, so im not sure about the memory saving value for your average joe blow. But, do you think having 10+ windows of your brower, opened and minimized on your taskbar or even grouped by xp for that matter is more convenient than having them tabbed and organized for you in one window? Call me crazy but I personally prefer the latter. :) |
|
|
| Fir3start3r |
| quote: | Originally posted by loconet
Yah, it's arguable I guess. The normal users now a days, with a fast enough computer wouldn't notice the difference, so im not sure about the memory saving value for your average joe blow. But, do you think having 10+ windows of your brower, opened and minimized on your taskbar or even grouped by xp for that matter is more convenient than having them tabbed and organized for you in one window? Call me crazy but I personally prefer the latter. :) |
Oh I totally agree with the tabbed browing...that option rawks!
That's why I use the MAXTHON browser.
I wouldn't be surprised to see the next ver. of IE implement this... |
|
|
|
|
