return to tranceaddict TranceAddict Forums Archive > Main Forums > Chill Out Room

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
The Price of Liberty (pg. 2)
View this Thread in Original format
placebo
quote:
Originally posted by AwakenedAddict
I'm not a "defeatist".. I'm just a realist.

Do you think your "candidate" will even get enough votes to ensure funding from the government for his party (5%).. yeh didn't think so. Vote for whomever you want, but there is no escaping the two party system until legislation changes it. Fat chance of that happening. No, the US doesn't have a perfect democracy, that's why you have to make your vote count. It has been described as the lesser of two evils, but really you are voting for a party and it's policy, not for a specific candidate.


You're just mad that we didn't vote for Kerry.

Thats how it is, people want you to vote, until they find out you don't want to vote for their candidate. Then they get pissed off.

Hilarity ensues.
AwakenedAddict
quote:
Originally posted by placebo
You're just mad that we didn't vote for Kerry.

Thats how it is, people want you to vote, until they find out you don't want to vote for their candidate. Then they get pissed off.

Hilarity ensues.


Haha, although I care how people vote, I recognize their right to choose. That said, I find I pretty sad that people actually think that voting for a third party candidate (especially one who has no chance to win and who has no real platform..) will be effective at all. It's pretty uneducated if you ask me
tu_face
quote:
Originally posted by AwakenedAddict
Haha, although I care how people vote, I recognize their right to choose. That said, I find I pretty sad that people actually think that voting for a third party candidate (especially one who has no chance to win and who has no real platform..) will be effective at all. It's pretty uneducated if you ask me


people can vote for who the hell they want can they not? if a vote such as his is uneducated, you should be shouting at all the brits who voted UKIP in the european elections. they had no chance of winning, they will never get in office, but the whole point was that it was a protest vote, much like i presume this is.

if people wish to vote for someone other than the 2 main candidates, that is not uneducated. more power to them, and people voting as such will encourage 3 party politics, which is what the US is in desperate need of.

back on topic, that sucks that you had to pay to vote. they should be paying it for you!
AwakenedAddict
1) I'm not really fermiliar with the UK voting system, but it's not a 2-party system is it?

2) I HATE the fact that the US is a two-party system, but until it's changed (which won't happen, since it has to be changed by legislation, and the legislative branch of the gov't is populated by YOU GUESSED IT democrats and republicans). Go vote for whomever you want....

3) Voting for candidates that have no representation in the house or senate is ludacris. If there was a system of proportional representation in place in the US, or even a mixed system, then voting for non-majority candidates would be feasible.
AwakenedAddict
quote:
Originally posted by tu_face
back on topic, that sucks that you had to pay to vote. they should be paying it for you!


Yeh, the election is tomorrow, and California requires that all the absentee ballots be into the polling stations by the end of election day. It sucks because I sent in an application for an absentee ballot like 2 months ago, all filled out properly, and they sent me back the same application :-/. It said that it had to be in by Oct 26, but that's when I recieved it back in the mail.
tu_face
quote:
Originally posted by AwakenedAddict
1) I'm not really fermiliar with the UK voting system, but it's not a 2-party system is it?

2) I HATE the fact that the US is a two-party system, but until it's changed (which won't happen, since it has to be changed by legislation, and the legislative branch of the gov't is populated by YOU GUESSED IT democrats and republicans). Go vote for whomever you want....

3) Voting for candidates that have no representation in the house or senate is ludacris. If there was a system of proportional representation in place in the US, or even a mixed system, then voting for non-majority candidates would be feasible.


we have a 3 party political system, with many smaller independant parties and even single candidates also within the system. there will never be legislation in the US for 3 party politics if nobody ever votes for people other than republicans or democrats, this is where i think you lot are stuck in a rut, anbd why i would encourage people to vote for others :)
UWM
quote:
Originally posted by AwakenedAddict
1) 3) Voting for candidates that have no representation in the house or senate is ludacris.


What does voting have to do with a rapper from Atlanta?



Ludicrous, perhaps.
AwakenedAddict
quote:
Originally posted by tu_face
there will never be legislation in the US for 3 party politics if nobody ever votes for people other than republicans or democrats, this is where i think you lot are stuck in a rut, anbd why i would encourage people to vote for others :)


Yeh i hear yah, but the barrier to access for "other" parties is just too high. They need 5% of the popular vote to be recognized for public funding, so that would be like 13 million votes (something like that). Even if they attained this goal, they still need to actually get seats in the house and the senate (and they'll need more than 5% of the vote to do so). I think that the US voting system (2 party, electoral college) and represtation structure (single member plurality) needs a huge revamp.
tu_face
quote:
Originally posted by AwakenedAddict
Yeh i hear yah, but the barrier to access for "other" parties is just too high. They need 5% of the popular vote to be recognized for public funding, so that would be like 13 million votes (something like that). Even if they attained this goal, they still need to actually get seats in the house and the senate (and they'll need more than 5% of the vote to do so). I think that the US voting system (2 party, electoral college) and represtation structure (single member plurality) needs a huge revamp.


totally agreed. maybe these 'rock the vote' people should concentrate on this as opposed to soley voter turnout.

maybe next elections eh? ;)
AwakenedAddict
quote:
Originally posted by UWM
What does voting have to do with a rapper from Atlanta?

Ludicrous, perhaps.


sp so sue me! arg

AwakenedAddict
quote:
Originally posted by tu_face
maybe next elections eh? ;)


Yea I hear that every election year ;)
placebo
I don't give a if a third party will ever be in office, I feel that if I vote for Bush or Kerry, I'm wasting my vote. Hence why I voted Libertarian.

That's why I like living in the US. You can put your 2 cents in.

Anyways, back on topic, 28 dollars to vote, thats hardcore.
CLICK TO RETURN TO TOP OF PAGE
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Privacy Statement